R v Mutede (Lindiwe)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | MR JUSTICE CRESSWELL |
| Judgment Date | 01 December 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWCA Crim 3208 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200505512 A1 |
| Date | 01 December 2005 |
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL CRIMINAL DIVISION
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London, WC2
Lord Justice Gage
Mr Justice Cresswell
His Honour Judge Goldsack QC
(Sitting As A Judge Of The Court Of Appeal Criminal Division)
No: 200505512 A1
MR S AKINSANYA appeared on behalf of the APPELLANT
On 11th August this year at Luton Magistrates' Court, the appellant, who is aged 35, pleaded guilty and was committed to the Crown Court for sentence. On 9th September, at the Luton Crown Court, she was sentenced by Mr Recorder Blackford as follows: offence 1, possession of a false instrument with intent, 14 months' imprisonment; offence 2, obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception, 14 months' imprisonment concurrent. Thus the total sentence amounted to 14 months' imprisonment. She appeals against sentence by leave of the single judge.
On 5th August this year police officers executed a search warrant at an address in Luton. The appellant was present and in her possession the officers found letters from the office of Immigration and Nationality Directorate, purporting to give her permission to stay and seek employment in the United Kingdom. Those letters were examined and found to be counterfeit. An immigration officer present at the search confirmed that the appellant was prohibited from seeking employment in the United Kingdom.
The officers also found a number of pay slips in the appellant's name. She had given a National Insurance number to her employer to obtain that employment. A counterfeit National Insurance card in her name was recovered.
Enquiries at her employers revealed that the appellant had worked from 16th July 2004 until 5th August 2005 as a care worker. Her employment was terminated on 5th August when the company was informed of her immigration status. As a result of her employment, she had been paid a total of £16,182.
When interviewed, the appellant immediately admitted that she had obtained the immigration letters to enable her to work and that was the reason she had also obtained the National Insurance card. She also admitted that she knew she was prohibited from working in this country and that she had deceived her employers.
The appellant is a Zimbabwean national of...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
R v Valerie Ekiuwa Ovieriakhi
...even on a guilty plea by a person of good character, would be within the range of twelve to eighteen months. 9 In R v Mutede [2005] EWCA Crim 3208, [2006] 2 Cr App R(S) 2, the appellant had pleaded guilty to possession of a false instrument with intent and to obtaining a pecuniary advantage......
-
R v Carneiro (Rosiene Ribeiro)
... ... Subsequently his attention was drawn to the decision of this court in the case of Mutede [2006] 2 Cr App R (S) 22. In the light of that decision the judge had the case re-listed and reduced the sentence to one of six months' imprisonment ... ...
-
R v Wendy Chengetayi Mtandagai
... ... Reference was made to the cases of R v Kolawole [2005] 2 Cr App R(S) 14, Mutede [2006] 2 Cr App R(S) 22 and Attorney General's Reference Nos 1 and 6 of 2008 (R V Dziruni and Laby) [2008] 2 Cr App R(S) 99 ... 9 ... ...
-
R v Rajnish Sharma
...and say this: on the authorities to which our attention has been invited in this case, in particular the three separate reported cases of R v Mutede (2005), R v Adebayosection 25(1), (2) and (6) of the Identity Cards Act 2006. He was sentenced to 12 months' immediate custody. 3 The applican......