R v Neal
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1949 |
| Year | 1949 |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
48 cases
-
Gonzalez v R
...All E.R. Rep. 253; (1898), 67 L.J.Q-B. 467; 78 L.T. 168; 62 J.P. 325; 14 T.L.R. 264; 42 Sol. Jo. 346; 19 Cox, C.C. 3. (7) R. v. Neal, [1949] 2 K.B. 590; [1949] 2 All E.R. 438; (1949), 65 T.L.R. 557; 113 J.P. 468; 93 Sol. Jo. 589; 48 L.G.R. 93; 33 Cr. App. R. 189, distinguished. (8) R. v. Ol......
- R v Furlong.; R v French.; R v Pickard
-
R v Rose (Newton) ; R v Johnson ; R v Clarke ; R v Henry
...to that of McKenna (1960) 44 Cr. App. R. 63, and the Court of Appeal, regarding themselves as bound by that case and the earlier case of Neal [1949] 2 K.B. 590, considered that they had no jurisdiction to order a venire de novo. Since they felt unable to apply the provisos to section 2(1) o......
-
R v Alexander
...which he then distinguished from the facts which the Court was then considering. 15 Lastly, Mr. Goudie has reminded us of the case of Rex v. Neal, reported in (1949) 2 King's Bench Reports at page 590. There the Recorder had been asked permission to let the jury, who had retired, leave the ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Reigniting the Lamp: The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors
...122 Lyons , above n 9, [33] ( French CJ, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ) . 123 R v Ketteridge (1916) 11 Cr App R 54, 57, affd R v Neal (1949) 33 Cr App R 189 , 193. 2017] The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors 45 private’. 124 Even when the rule of complete separation of t......
-
Court of Criminal Appeal
...must consider whether ornotitisanirregularitywhich goestotheroot ofthecase, as, for instance, in R. u. 288THEJOURNALOFCRIMINAL LAWNeale (1949 2K.B.590), in which a jury, having beenenclosed to consider their verdict, were allowedbytherecorder during their enclosure to leavethecourttohavethe......