R v Neal

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1949
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
49 cases
  • Gonzalez v R
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court (Cayman Islands)
    • 6 March 1984
    ...All E.R. Rep. 253; (1898), 67 L.J.Q-B. 467; 78 L.T. 168; 62 J.P. 325; 14 T.L.R. 264; 42 Sol. Jo. 346; 19 Cox, C.C. 3. (7) R. v. Neal, [1949] 2 K.B. 590; [1949] 2 All E.R. 438; (1949), 65 T.L.R. 557; 113 J.P. 468; 93 Sol. Jo. 589; 48 L.G.R. 93; 33 Cr. App. R. 189, distinguished. (8) R. v. Ol......
  • R v Furlong.; R v French.; R v Pickard
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • R v Rose (Newton) ; R v Johnson ; R v Clarke ; R v Henry
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 1 July 1982
    ...to that of McKenna (1960) 44 Cr. App. R. 63, and the Court of Appeal, regarding themselves as bound by that case and the earlier case of Neal [1949] 2 K.B. 590, considered that they had no jurisdiction to order a venire de novo. Since they felt unable to apply the provisos to section 2(1) o......
  • R v Alexander
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 2 November 1973
    ...which he then distinguished from the facts which the Court was then considering. 15 Lastly, Mr. Goudie has reminded us of the case of Rex v. Neal, reported in (1949) 2 King's Bench Reports at page 590. There the Recorder had been asked permission to let the jury, who had retired, leave the ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Reigniting the Lamp: The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 42-2, October 2017
    • 1 October 2017
    ...122 Lyons , above n 9, [33] ( French CJ, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ) . 123 R v Ketteridge (1916) 11 Cr App R 54, 57, affd R v Neal (1949) 33 Cr App R 189 , 193. 2017] The Case for Including People who are Blind or Deaf as Jurors 45 private’. 124 Even when the rule of complete separation of t......
  • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 14-3, July 1950
    • 1 July 1950
    ...must consider whether ornotitisanirregularitywhich goestotheroot ofthecase, as, for instance, in R. u. 288THEJOURNALOFCRIMINAL LAWNeale (1949 2K.B.590), in which a jury, having beenenclosed to consider their verdict, were allowedbytherecorder during their enclosure to leavethecourttohavethe......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT