R v Norfolk Justices, ex parte DPP

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1950
Date1950
CourtDivisional Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Bradburn v Richards
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • S. (an Infant) v Recorder of Manchester
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ...504E, G - 505A, 507H - 508A). Observations of Lord Goddard C.J. inRex v. Norfolk Justices, Ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1950] 2 K.B. 558, 569; [1950] 2 All E.R. 42, D.C. applied. 1 Magistrates' Courts Act, 1952, s. 13: "(3) If the accused pleads guilty, the court may convict hi......
  • R (Salubi and another) v Bow Street Magistrates' Court
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 10 May 2002
    ...complaint would not have availed Boucher in seeking to prevent the prosecution and the magistrates' court from starting again. See R v. Norfolk Justices, ex p. DPP [1950] 2 KB 558. 60 As to the magistrates' "committal" of the conspiracy offences on 16 th September, I do not consider that it......
  • Junkanoo Estates Ltd v UBS (Bahamas) Ltd (in Voluntary Liquidation)
    • Bahamas
    • Court of Appeal (Bahamas)
    • 26 October 2022
    ...considered R v. Essex Justices ex p Final (1962) 3 All ER 924 mentioned R v. Norfolk Justices, ex parte Director of Public Prosecutions [1950] 2 KB 558 considered Re 56 Denton Road Twickenham, Middlesex [1952] 2 All ER 799 mentioned Regina (Demetrio) v. Independent Police Complaints Comm......
  • Get Started for Free