R v Norfolk Quarter Sessions. ex parte Brunson

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtDivisional Court
Date1953
Year1953

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
27 cases
  • DPP v Windle
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 2000
    ...before the District Judge, would be admitted at the trial, was another matter. R. v. Norfolk Quarter Sessions. Ex parte BrunsonELR [1953] 1 Q.B. 503 followed. 2. That once a search warrant existed, it was not for a judge conducting a preliminary examination to determine the validity or othe......
  • Re Smalley
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 February 1985
    ...no power to try a charge of dangerous driving on indictment as the defendant had not elected to go for trial, and in Reg. v. Norfolk Quarter Sessions; Ex parte Brunson [1953] 1 Q.B. 503, where the court declined to proceed because some inadmissible evidence had been given before the commit......
  • Neill v North Antrim Magistrates' Court and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 November 1992
    ... ... v. Acton Justices, Ex parte McMullen (1990) 92 Cr. App. R. 98 , a case on documentary ... There are some very robust statements in R. v. Norfolk Quarter Sessions, Ex parte Brunson [1953] 1 Q.B. 503 , R ... ...
  • Re George Weekes
    • Trinidad & Tobago
    • High Court (Trinidad and Tobago)
    • Invalid date
  • Get Started for Free