R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Pamela Coughlan Secretary of State for Health (Intervenor) Royal College of Nursing (Intervenor)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD WOOLF, MR |
| Judgment Date | 16 July 1999 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1999] EWCA Civ J0716-7 |
| Docket Number | QBCOF 1999/0110/4 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Date | 16 July 1999 |
In the Matter of an Application for Judicial Review
and
and
[1999] EWCA Civ J0716-7
The Master of the Rolls
(Lord Woolf)
Lord Justice Mummery
Lord Justice Sedley
QBCOF 1999/0110/4
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF JUDICATURE
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL (CIVIL DIVISION)
ON APPEAL FROM THE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION (Crown Office List)
(MR JUSTICE HIDDEN)
Royal Courts of Justice
Strand
London WC2
MR R GORDON QC with MR T WARD and MISS J RICHARDS (Instructed by Messrs T V Edwards, London, E1 4TP) appeared on behalf of the Appellant.
MR N PLEMING QC and MR S KOVATS (Instructed by the Treasury Solicitor, London, SW1H 9JS) appeared on behalf of the Secretary of State.
MR T GOUDIE and MISS S WARD (Instructed by Messrs Bevan Ashford, Bristol, BS1 4TT) appeared on behalf of the Respondent
MR P HAVERS and MR K STERN (Instructed by the Royal College of Nursing Legal Dept, London, W1M OAB) appeared on behalf of the Royal College of Nursing.
Friday 16 July 1999
We have given careful consideration to the arguments as to the order for costs to be made on this appeal. An appeal such as this is an extremely expensive process and, although a party may succeed generally on an appeal, in my judgment it is important that the court looks at what has happened on the various issues which have been raised. If a party has been successful on some issues and unsuccessful on others, it may well be that the appropriate order in all the circumstances is that the party who has generally been successful should not recover all their costs. This is to encourage parties to consider very carefully whether it is right to incur the costs of advancing a particular argument.
This case undoubtedly does not fall within the generality of cases. It is not a case where only the parties themselves are affected by the outcome. It has general significance which meant that it was very important that the difficult issues were to be considered in full. For example, we heard argument from the Secretary of State where that argument would normally not be necessary because there was a community of...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
[1] The Hon. Gaston Browne, Leader of the Opposition [2] The Hon. Lester B. Bird [3] The Hon. Asot A. Michael [4] Mr. Eisen Baptiste [5] Ms. Paulet Hinkson Appellants/Applicants v [1] The Constituencies Boundaries Commission [2] Attorney General of Antigua and Barbuda [3] The Speaker of the House of Representatives [4] The Prime Minister of Antigua and Barbuda Attorney General (for and on Behalf of her Excellency the Governor General) Respondents [ECSC]
...information in the circumstances of this case cannot be sustained. Regina v North and East Devon Health Authority, Ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213 applied; Bushell and Another v Secretary of State for the Environment [1980] 3 WLR 22 applied. 3. In order for a charge of gerrymandering to s......
-
Michael Power and Others v The Minister for Social and Family Affairs
...INCORPORATED 1992 QB 353 UNITED STATES TOBACCO (IRL) LTD v IRELAND 1993 1 IR 241 R v NORTH & EAST DEVON HA EX PARTE COUGHLAN 2001 QB 213 KEOGH v CRIMINAL ASSETS BUREAU (CAB) & ORS 2004 2 IR 159 2004 2 ILRM 481 2004/26/6080 JUDICIAL REVIEW Remedies SOCIAL WELFARE Benefit Delay - Discretio......
-
Curran v Minister for Education
...v Home Department [2005] EWCA Civ 1363, [2005] All ER (D) 283 and R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213 approved - Financial Emergency Measures in the Public Interest Act 2009 (No 5), ss 2, 9 & 10 - Relief refused (2009/218 & 219 JR - Dunne J - 31/7/2009......
-
R (on the application of Dickinson and Others) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners
...(No 2) [2014] AC 700 at paragraph 29, and (ii) Lord Woolf MR's judgment in R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex p Coughlan [2001] QB 213 which demonstrates the relevance of an analysis that has regard to whether a legitimate expectation is procedural or substantive and has been said......
-
RIGHTISM, REASONABLENESS AND REVIEW: SECTION 377A OF THE PENAL CODE AND THE QUESTION OF EQUALITY – PART ONE
...understanding of the judicial role in public law would be required. 68 In R v North and East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213, the promise to a severely disabled person and seven other patients was that if she moved to Mardon House, an NHS facility for the long-term d......
-
LOCALISING ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN SINGAPORE
...Teng @ Kallang Pte Ltd v Singapore Land Authority[2014] 1 SLR 1047 at [119]. 69R v North & East Devon Health Authority, ex parte Coughlan[2000] 2 WLR 622 (“Coughlan”) at [66]. This used to be the approach prior to Coughlan (see, eg, R v Home Secretary, ex parte Hargreaves[1997] 1 WLR 906). ......
-
Table of Cases
...Council [1999] PLCR 51, [1998] EG 131 (CS), (1998) 10 Admin LR 676, CA 134 R v North and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Coughlan [2001] QB 213, [2000] 2 WLR 622, [2000] 3 All ER 850, CA 265 R v Oldreeve (1868) 32 JP 271 546, 596, 597 R v Oxfordshire County Council ex parte Sunningwell......
-
The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September?
...its use dependent on the existence ofambiguity’.112 [1993] AC 1 AC 593.113 See RvNorth and East Devon Health Authority ex parte Coughlan [2000] 2 WLR 622. Thissuggestion is put forward very tentatively in this context since national security considerations arise.114 The government accepted ......