R v Pamenter

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Year1872
Date1872

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
12 cases
  • Rumping v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Shenton v. Tyler [ 1939 ] Ch. 620 ; 55 T.L.R. 522 ; [ 1939 ] 1 All E.R. 827 , C.A. considered ... Rex v. Smithies ( 1832 ) 5 C. & P. 332 ; Rex v. Simons ( 1834 ) 6 C. & P. 540 and Rex v. Bartlett ( 1837 ) 7 C. & P. 832 applied ... Reg. v. Pamenter ( 1872 ) 12 Cox C.C. 177 not followed ... (2) That although the judge had an overriding discretion to exclude the letter, even though it might be admissible, there must be some ground upon which the discretion could be exercised, and, since there was none here, no criticism could be made ... ...
  • Rumping v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • Invalid date
  • The Queen v Rey Rodriguez Anand Lettsome
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 17 February 2020
    ...is bad on its face (e.g. for duplicity or because the particulars of a count do not disclose an offence known to law, as in Yates (1872) 12 Cox CC 233). (b) Where the indictment (or a count thereof) has been preferred otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Administration of......
  • The Queen v Rey Rodriguez Anand Lettsome
    • British Virgin Islands
    • High Court (British Virgin Islands)
    • 17 February 2020
    ...is bad on its face(e.g. for duplicity or because the particulars of a count do not disclose an offence known to law, as in Yates (1872) 12 Cox CC 233). (b) Where the indictment (or a count thereof) has been preferred otherwise than in accordance with the provisions of the Administration of ......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Redefining rape: The Scottish approach
    • South Africa
    • Juta South African Criminal Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 24 May 2019
    ...disease (R v Clarence (1888) 16 Cox CC 511). 9 R v Camplin (1845) 1 Cox CC 220. Cf H M Advocate v Logan 1936 JC 100. R v Mayers (1872) 12 Cox CC 31; R v Young (1878) 14 Cox CC 114; Charles Sweenie (1858) 3 Irvine 109. 11 Cf H M Advocate v Grainger and Rae 1932 JC 40. 12 R v Pletcher (1859) ......