R v Panel of Takeovers and Mergers ex parte Al-Fayed
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your 7-day Trial
60 cases
-
[1] Henry Liu [2] Feng Huang Appellants v [1] Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica [2] DPP [3] Comptroller of Customs Respondents [ECSC]
...of the applicants is not amendable to judicial review." 19 This is in alignment with a dictum uttered by his Lordship in R v Panel On Takeovers Ex Parte Fayed20 when he said: "But it seems to me that in the absence of fraud, corruption or mala fides, judicial review will not be allowed to p......
-
[1] Henry Liu [2] Feng Huang Appellants v [1] Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Dominica [2] DPP [3] Comptroller of Customs Respondents [ECSC]
...of the applicants is not amendable to judicial review." 19 This is in alignment with a dictum uttered by his Lordship in R v Panel On Takeovers Ex Parte Fayed20 when he said: "But it seems to me that in the absence of fraud, corruption or mala fides, judicial review will not be allowed to p......
-
O Ceallaigh v Fitness to Practice Committee
...LTD V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR TRADE 1978 CH 201 PARRY JONES V LAW SOCIETY 1969 1 CH 1 R V PANEL ON TAKEOVERS & MERGERS EX-PARTE FAYED 1992 BCLC 938 FURNELL V WHANGAREI HIGH SCHOOLS BOARD 1973 AC 660 GARDA SIOCHANA (COMPLAINTS) ACT 1986 NURSES ACT 1985 S9 1 Judgment of The Hon. Mrs. Justic......
-
Thomas Murphy v Ireland and Others
...this point how this matter has been considered in comparable jurisdictions. In R v. Panel on Take overs and Mergers, Ex parte Al-Fayed [1992] B.C.C. 524, Steyn L.J. (as he was) said of the reviewability of decisions of the Director of Public Prosecutions: "[I]t seems to me that, in the abse......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Wednesbury Unreasonableness in Irish Judicial Review: No Evidence of Sub-Super or Pragmatic-Functional Approaches?
...seen in context and it is to this context that the Irish Supreme Court will likely 82 R v. Panel of Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Fayed [1992] BCC 524, at 536. 83 Unreported, High Court, 6 May 2000, at 15, per Morris P. 84 [1999] 4 All ER 860. 85 Unreported, Supreme Court, 1 March 2002, a......
-
Explaining the Different Propensities to Litigate in Takeovers in the UK and US
...Guinness [1989] 1 All ER 509, 512 (per Lord Donaldson MR). 102 [1990] 1 QB 146. 103 R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers ex parte Fayed [1992] BCLC 938. 104 Guinness (n 101 ). 105 Guinness (n 101 ); see also Jonathan Mukwiri, ‘The Myth of Tactical Litigation in UK Takeovers’ (2008) 2006 Journ......
-
ENFORCING PUBLIC TAKEOVER REGULATION
...2006). 41 R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Guinness plc [1990] 1 QB 146. R v Panel on Takeovers and Mergers, ex parte Fayed [1992] BCLC 938. 42 [2017] CSOH 156. 43 An appeal by David King was dismissed: Panel on Takeovers and Mergers v David King [2018] CSIH 30. 44 This provisio......