R v Peter Kenneth Smith
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Thomas,SIR ANTHONY MAY,MR JUSTICE TREACY,LORD JUSTICE THOMAS,MR JUSTICE SWEENEY |
| Judgment Date | 24 May 2011 |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] EWCA Crim 1296,[2010] EWCA Crim J1020-1 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [2010] EWCA Crim J0420-1 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 24 May 2011 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2009/03393/C1,No: 200903393/C1 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
1 cases
-
R v Ramoon
...course of the attempted robbery. The fingerprints were clear and the defence made no attempt to call expert evidence (R. v. Smith, [2011] EWCA Crim 1296, distinguished;R. v. Carillo-Perez, Ind. No. 89/08, July 26th, 2011, distinguished). The court accepted the expert evidence that the ACE-V......
6 books & journal articles
-
Away from the Numbers: Opinion in the Court of Appeal
...includingthe defence experts, and a careful and detailed minute is prepared, signed226 Above n. 215 at [19].227 Rv Smith (Peter) [2011] EWCA Crim 1296 at [62].228 Ibid. at [13].229 Ibid. at [61].230 Ibid.231 Ibid. at [10].232 See Rv Reed and Reed [2009] EWCA Crim 2698, [2010] 1 Cr App R 23 ......
-
Regularising the Regulator: The Government's Consultation about Placing the Forensic Science Regulator on a Statutory Footing
...at http://www.forensic-science-society.org.uk/news?Print=1, accessed 21 February 2014.145 Ibid. at 4.146 See, e.g., R v Smith [2011] EWCA Crim 1296 at [61] with regard to the position of fingerprint experts. 147 R (on the application of Doughty) v Ely Magistrates’ Court [2008] EWHC 522 (Ad......
-
The Forensic Ethics of Scientific Communication
...assigned to the conclusions drawn’.81It is essential that (for example):74. Keohane et al. (n 8), 352.75. Crim PR 19.3(3)(d); Smith [2011] EWCA Crim 1296; [2011] 2 Cr App R 16, [61].76. Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh 1953 SC 34, 40.77. H Collins Are We All Scientific Experts Now? (Cambri......
-
The Forensic Ethics of Scientific Communication
...assigned to the conclusions drawn’.81It is essential that (for example):74. Keohane et al. (n 8), 352.75. Crim PR 19.3(3)(d); Smith [2011] EWCA Crim 1296; [2011] 2 Cr App R 16, [61].76. Davie v Magistrates of Edinburgh 1953 SC 34, 40.77. H Collins Are We All Scientific Experts Now? (Cambri......
Request a trial to view additional results