R v Popescu (Nicolae Lucian)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE HUGHES,MRS JUSTICE RAFFERTY,LORD JUSTICE AIKENS |
| Judgment Date | 20 May 2010 |
| Neutral Citation | [2010] EWCA Crim 1230,[2009] EWCA Crim 2834 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200804501 D3 |
| Date | 20 May 2010 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
Stephen Stubbs v R
...considered R v Morris [1998] Crim LR 416 considered R v O'Laughlin and McLaughlin (1987) 85 Cr App R 157 distinguished R v Popescu [2010] EWCA Crim 1230 considered R v Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59 considered Reid v R (1978) 27 WIR 254 applied Shivnarine v The State (2012) 80 WIR 357 me......
-
R v Sothilingham (Prashad)
...that should be given. As far as we can ascertain they were not put before the trial judge or if they were, not in any detail. In R v Popescu [2010] EWCA Crim 1230 the court analysed the available guidance. In Popescu, the jury had been given transcripts of the ABE interview with the compla......
-
Karl Pagan Raine v The Crown
...attention to the passage in Archbold at 8–92, under the heading 'Transcript for Jury'. Although we will come to the cases of Popescu [2010] EWCA Crim 1230 and Sardar [2012] EWCA Crim 134, there is a reference to ( Coshall The Times, 17 February 1995), which suggests that, where a Jury asks ......
-
Aamir Sardar v The Crown
...which a judge should give to the jury, in the event that it is shown, have recently been considered and explained in R v Popescu [2010] EWCA Crim 1230. The judgment is dated 20 May 2010 and thus after this trial had concluded. But the judgment identifies no new principle but is founded on ......
Request a trial to view additional results