R v Preddy ; R v Slade ; R v Dhillon ; (Conjoined appeals)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1995 |
| Year | 1995 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
74 cases
-
Gdansk Regional Court v Ulatowski
... ... referred to Kohn (1979) 69 Cr App R 395 and Preddy [1996] AC 815 it was argued that the withdrawal of sums ... ...
-
R v Waya (Terry)
...in consequence of the mortgage arrangement. 19 He relies on the analysis of the position at common law given by Lord Goff in the case of R v Preddy [1996] 2 Cr App R 524. In that case the House of Lords concluded that a mortgagor did not obtain funds belonging to another for the purposes of......
-
R v Mohammed Shabir
...be straightforward. The reason section 15A of the Theft Act 1968 was introduced was that payments by cheque and bank transfer were held in R v Preddy [1996] AC 815 not to involve the obtaining of “property belonging to another”. Applying what is said by Lord Goff at page 834, in a case wher......
-
JSC BTA Bank v Mukhtar Ablyazov and Another
... ... this is so follows from authorities such as R v Preddy [1996] AC 815 (at 834B–835B) which establish that a ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Virtual Money, Vanishing Law: Dematerialisation in Electronic Funds Transfer, Financial Wrongs and Doctrinal Makeshifts in English Legal Structures
...(41) Cf. A. Endeshaw, 'Transfer of Money Through Banks Involves No Property?' [1996] JIBL 532; M. Farmer, 'Case Comment: R ν Preddy', [1995] Crim LR 564; D. Fox, 'Property Rights and Electronic Fund Transfers', [1996] LMCLQ 456; M. Salt and D. Southern, 'Criminal Deception: A Glaring Anomal......
-
Theft Act 1968, S. 15A: Obtaining Money Transfer by Deception
...account, brought about by dishonest misrepresenta-tion, amounted to the obtaining of property within s. 15.The Court of Appeal (see [1995] Crim LR 564) had been of theopinion that the central issue was whether the transfers constituted‘property’ within s. 4(1) and concluded that it was inta......