R (Purdy) v DPP

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
JudgeLORD HOPE OF CRAIGHEAD,LORD NEUBERGER OF ABBOTSBURY,LORD BROWN OF EATON-UNDER-HEYWOOD,BARONESS HALE OF RICHMOND,LORD PHILLIPS OF WORTH MATRAVERS
Judgment Date30 July 2009
Neutral Citation[2009] UKHL 45
CourtHouse of Lords
Date30 July 2009
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
64 cases
  • Nicklinson v Ministry of Justice; R (on the applicaion of AM) v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 31 July 2013
    ...to determine whether it is in the public interest to prosecute. 24 As a result of the decision of the House of Lords in R (Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45; [2010] 1 AC 345 , the DPP was required to set out in some detail in a Policy statement the factors which he will take into account whe......
  • Fleming v Ireland and Others
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 10 January 2013
    ...ALBERTA v HUTTERIAN BRETHERN OF WILSON COLONY 2009 SCC 37 R (PRETTY) v DPP 2002 1 AC 800 PRETTY v UK 2002 35 EHRR 1 R (PURDY) v DPP 2010 1 AC 345 2009 3 WLR 403 2009 4 AER 1147 EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ART 8(2) EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ART 8(1) PROSECUTION OF OFFENCES ......
  • AG v Garland
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 27 January 2012
    ...631, [2004] QB 1418; R v Smith (Wallace) TLR 13/11/1995 and Liangsiriprasert v United States [1991] 1 AC 225 approved - R (Purdy) v DPP [2010] 1 AC 345; Stanton v O'Toole [2000] IESC 36, (Unrep, SC, 9/11/2000); Harris v Wren [1984] ILRM 120; Board of Trade v Owen [1957] AC 602; R (Purdy) v ......
  • Petition Of Charles O'neill And William Lauchlan For Judicial Review Of The Prisons And Young Offenders Institutions Rules 2011, Rule 63(8), Etcetera And Answers For The Scottish Ministers
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 28 October 2015
    ...visits will be arranged [cf. R (Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions (Society for the Protection of Unborn Children intervening) [2010] 1 AC 345]. The supplementary opinion deals with this matter. ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Euthanasia – What is the law in Australia?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 September 2015
    ...4 For example see the NSW DPP Guidelines, last revised in 2007, at www.odpp.nsw.gov.au. 5 In R (on the application of Purdy) v DPP [2009] UKHL 45. 6 Note the guidelines do not specifically cover euthanasia where the charge is likely to be murder or manslaughter. 7 Crown Prosecution Service ......
30 books & journal articles
  • Protecting Patients with Passports: Medical Tourism and the Patient-Protective Argument
    • United States
    • Iowa Law Review No. 95-5, July 2010
    • 1 July 2010
    ...Abigail Alliance for Better Access to Developmental Drugs v. von Eschenbach, 495 F.3d 695 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (en banc). [27] See R v. DPP [2009] UKHL 45 (U.K.) (dealing with a similar fact pattern in the U.K. [28] For more on the ethical and legal issues raised by these two other categories, ......
  • Hidden Law‐Making in the Province of Medical Jurisprudence
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 77-3, May 2014
    • 1 May 2014
    ...from Judge CJ at [153]–[156] (which could possibly also be addressed to theapproach of the House of Lords in R (Purdy) vDPP [2009] UKHL 45).106 Re R [1991] 4 All ER 177; Re W (1992) BMLR 22.107 As set out in Gillick vWest Norfolk and Wisbech AHA n 82 above, discussed below.Jonathan Montgome......
  • A Right to Assist? Assisted Dying and the Interim Policy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 74-1, February 2010
    • 1 February 2010
    ...ben.livings@sunderland.ac.uk.1R (on the application of Pretty) vDPP [2002] 1 AC 800; Pretty v United Kingdom(2002) 35 EHRR 1; Purdy vDPP [2009] UKHL 45.2Purdy vDPP [2009] UKHL 45.3 Hereafter referred to as the ‘Interim Policy’, available at http://www.cps.gov.uk/consultations/as_index.html,......
  • PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND THE LEGAL LIMITS IN SINGAPORE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...should be discontinued; or (ii) what charges should be preferred. 171R (on the application of Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions[2010] 1 AC 345 at [54], per Lord Phillips. 172R (on the application of Purdy) v Director of Public Prosecutions[2010] 1 AC 345 at [59], per Baroness Hale. 1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT