R v Radio Authority, ex parte Bull
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 1995 |
Year | 1995 |
Date | 1995 |
Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Colgan v IRTC
...PRISON EX-PARTE CHENG 1973 AC 931 MURPHY V INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION 1997 2 ILRM 467 R V RADIO AUTHORITY EX-PARTE BULL 1995 3 WLR 572 MCGOVERN V AG 1982 CH 321 RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S9(1)(v) RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S10(6) EAST DONEGAL CO-OP V AG 1970 IR 317 1 JU......
-
R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
...save to observe that the principles summarised above were consistently preserved and given effect: see R v Radio Authority, Ex p Bull [1996] QB 169, [1998] QB 294. The 2003 Act is a very comprehensive measure, running to over 400 sections and 19 schedules. Chapter 4 of Part 3 contains reg......
-
Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission
...the decision of the learned trial Judge and dismisses the Applicant'sappeal. 65jb216. 1In Regina v. Radio Authority, ex parte Bull, 1995, 3 W.L.R., P. 572 at ...
-
R. v. United Kingdom (Secretary of State for Culture, media and Sport), [2008] N.R. Uned. 148 (HL)
...save to observe that the principles summarised above were consistently preserved and given effect: see R. v. Radio Authority, Ex p Bull [1996] Q.B. 169, [1998] Q.B. 294. The 2003 Act is a very comprehensive measure, running to over 400 sections and 19 schedules. Chapter 4 of Part 3 contains......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? Murphy v. Independent Radio and Television Commission
...of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. 25 (1994) 17 EHRR 93. 26 [1995] 3 WLR 572. 1998] Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? important one. It is also worthwhile to have regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on ......
-
Foundations of Charity Law in the New Welfare State
...NZLJ 55, 62.68 [1993] AC 534, where it was held that a local council, being a governmental body, could not sue fordefamation at all.69 [1996] QB 169; [1997] 2 All ER 561 (CA).The Modern Law Review [Vol. 62344 ßThe Modern Law Review Limited licensed radio stations from broadcasting its adver......
-
Demanding Service or Servicing Demand? Charities, Regulation and the Policy Process
...to be able to determine if a political purpose has public bene¢tBowman n 76above,4 42,Lord Parker.106 RvRadioAuthority, ex parte Bull[1995] 4 All ER 481, a case under broadcasting law,extended theterm‘political’to i nclude any matter which pertained to government policy.107 White Paper Char......
-
Debating ‘Democracy’ and the Ban on Political Advertising
...appealed the Divisional Court’s4 n 1above at [6].The courts have consistently givene¡ect to the ban. See eg RvRadioAuthority, Ex pBull [1996] Q B 169.5 Ofcom Broadcasting Code, s 5.6 Communications Act 2003,ss 319(2)(c)and (d).7 http://www.ad-international.org/home/(last visited 11October 2......