R v Radio Authority, ex parte Bull

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1995
Year1995
Date1995
CourtDivisional Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • Colgan v IRTC
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 1 January 1999
    ...PRISON EX-PARTE CHENG 1973 AC 931 MURPHY V INDEPENDENT RADIO & TELEVISION COMMISSION 1997 2 ILRM 467 R V RADIO AUTHORITY EX-PARTE BULL 1995 3 WLR 572 MCGOVERN V AG 1982 CH 321 RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S9(1)(v) RADIO & TELEVISION ACT 1988 S10(6) EAST DONEGAL CO-OP V AG 1970 IR 317 1 JU......
  • R (Animal Defenders International) v Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 12 March 2008
    ...save to observe that the principles summarised above were consistently preserved and given effect: see R v Radio Authority, Ex p Bull [1996] QB 169, [1998] QB 294. The 2003 Act is a very comprehensive measure, running to over 400 sections and 19 schedules. Chapter 4 of Part 3 contains reg......
  • Murphy v Independent Radio and Television Commission
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 1 January 1999
    ...the decision of the learned trial Judge and dismisses the Applicant'sappeal. 65jb216. 1In Regina v. Radio Authority, ex parte Bull, 1995, 3 W.L.R., P. 572 at ...
  • R. v. United Kingdom (Secretary of State for Culture, media and Sport), [2008] N.R. Uned. 148 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 12 March 2008
    ...save to observe that the principles summarised above were consistently preserved and given effect: see R. v. Radio Authority, Ex p Bull [1996] Q.B. 169, [1998] Q.B. 294. The 2003 Act is a very comprehensive measure, running to over 400 sections and 19 schedules. Chapter 4 of Part 3 contains......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? Murphy v. Independent Radio and Television Commission
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review No. I-1998, January 1998
    • 1 January 1998
    ...of information received in confidence, or for maintaining the authority and impartiality of the judiciary. 25 (1994) 17 EHRR 93. 26 [1995] 3 WLR 572. 1998] Does Expression Have Any Freedom Left? important one. It is also worthwhile to have regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on ......
  • Foundations of Charity Law in the New Welfare State
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 62-3, May 1999
    • 1 May 1999
    ...NZLJ 55, 62.68 [1993] AC 534, where it was held that a local council, being a governmental body, could not sue fordefamation at all.69 [1996] QB 169; [1997] 2 All ER 561 (CA).The Modern Law Review [Vol. 62344 ßThe Modern Law Review Limited licensed radio stations from broadcasting its adver......
  • Demanding Service or Servicing Demand? Charities, Regulation and the Policy Process
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 71-2, March 2008
    • 1 March 2008
    ...to be able to determine if a political purpose has public bene¢tBowman n 76above,4 42,Lord Parker.106 RvRadioAuthority, ex parte Bull[1995] 4 All ER 481, a case under broadcasting law,extended theterm‘political’to i nclude any matter which pertained to government policy.107 White Paper Char......
  • Debating ‘Democracy’ and the Ban on Political Advertising
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 72-3, May 2009
    • 1 May 2009
    ...appealed the Divisional Court’s4 n 1above at [6].The courts have consistently givene¡ect to the ban. See eg RvRadioAuthority, Ex pBull [1996] Q B 169.5 Ofcom Broadcasting Code, s 5.6 Communications Act 2003,ss 319(2)(c)and (d).7 http://www.ad-international.org/home/(last visited 11October 2......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT