R v Rand

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1865
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
69 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • Sub-regional Courts and the Recusal Issue: Emergent Practice of the East African Court of Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • African Journal of International and Comparative Law No. , October 2012
    • 1 October 2012
    ...This was originally an immutable principle, such that any direct financial interest, ‘however small’,1414See Blackburn J in R v Rand (1866) LR 1 QB 230, 232; Slade J in R v Camborne Justices ex p Pearce [1955] 1 QB 41, 47. attracted disqualification. However, de minimis financial interests ......
  • Judicial Bias and Disqualification after Pinochet (No. 2)
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 63-1, January 2000
    • 1 January 2000
    ...[1924] KB 256, 259.7 See the observation of Lord Widgery CJ in RvAltrincham Justices, ex parte Pennington [1975] 1 QB549, 552.8RvRand (1866) LR 1 QB 230; London and North-Western Railway Co vLindsay (1858) 3 Macq 99,Sellar vHighland Railway Co 1991 SC (HL) 19.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 631......
  • SINGAPORE ACADEMY OF LAW ANNUAL LECTURE 2004: IMPARTIALITY IN JUDGING AND THE PASSIONS OF MANKIND
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2005, December 2005
    • 1 December 2005
    ...(Great Britain), Limited [1916] 2 AC 307. 13 Dimes v Proprietors of Grand Junction Canal [1852] 3 HL Cas 759; 10 ER 301. R v Rand(1866) LR 1 QB 230 at 232 per Blackburn J. 14 Sir William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England: Book the Third (15th Ed, 1809) at p 361. 15 [1993] AC 6......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT