R v Rhodes
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Criminal Appeal |
| Year | 1959 |
| Date | 1959 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
26 cases
-
R v Singh et Al
...known as the special direction in asses where the prosecution relies on circumstantial evidence. It was the one given by Alderson, B. in R. v. Hodge, (1838) 2 Lew. C. C. 228 to the effect that: “It is the duty of the trial judge not only to tell the jury generally that they must be satisfie......
-
R v Hayter (Paul Ali)
...was in accord with first principles: R v Hayter [2003] 1 WLR 1910. Mantell LJ reviewed three earlier decisions of the Court of Appeal, viz R v Rhodes (1959) 44 Cr App R 23; R v Spinks [1982] 1 All E R 587; R v Hickey (unreported), 30 July 1997 (the "Carl Bridgewater" case). Mantell LJ obs......
-
S v Mhlongo; S v Nkosi
...All ER (D) 36; [2005] 2 Cr App R 3): dicta in paras [7] – [8] followed R v Moore (1956) 40 Cr App R 50 (CCA): referred to R v Rhodes (1960) 44 Cr App Rep 23: referred to F R v Spinks [1982] 1 All ER 587 (CA) ((1981) 74 Cr App R 263): referred R v Turner 168 ER 1298 ((1832) 1 Mood CC 347): f......
-
S v Mhlongo; S v Nkosi
...R v Moore (1956) 40 Cr App R 50 (CCA); Surujpaul (called Dick) v R [1958] 3 All ER 300 ([1958] 1 WLR 1050) at 304A – B; R v Rhodes (1960) 44 Cr App Rep 23 at 28; and R v Spinks [1982] 1 All ER 587 (CA) ((1981) 74 Cr App R 263) at 589d – e. All these cases find that extra-curial evidence tha......
Get Started for Free