R v Richards (Michael Anthony)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE TOULSON |
| Judgment Date | 23 July 2008 |
| Neutral Citation | [2008] EWCA Crim 1841 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 2006/06331/C1 |
| Date | 23 July 2008 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
Kazakhstan Kagazy Plc v Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunus (formerly Baglan Abdullayevich Zhunussov)
...( JSC BTA Bank v Solodchenko & Ors [2015] EWHC 3680, [8]).” (§ 605) 282 As to motive, Toulson LJ pointed out in R v Richards [2008] EWCA Crim 1841 that: “…No self-respecting organised criminal would expect to be caught with high-value property in his own name readily identifiable…As a matt......
-
R v Hayes
...that Ms Tighe thereupon became the sole legal and beneficial owner of The Old Rectory: cf. the observations of Toulson LJ in Richards [2008] EWCA Crim 1841, in particular at paragraph 19 of his judgment. 50 The point, however, remains as to what is the impact of s. 78 of the 2002 Act, for t......
-
Re L
...the scheme could have reinvested them in the donor defendant, but that is not the approach the Act takes (see, e.g., R v Richards [2008] EWCA Crim 1841; and Larkfield Ltd v HM Customs & Revenue Prosecution Office [2010] EWCA Civ 521 at [31] per Etherton LJ in relation to the substantively s......
-
R v Beverley Johnson (formerly known as Farmer)
...against a decision under section 23, see section 50( 1)(cb) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1968. Mr. Byrne had relied on R v. Richards [2008] EWCA Crim 1841 and Najafpour (the passage cited above) in support of a submission that the plain words of section 23(2) should be read with section 23(5)......
Request a trial to view additional results