R v Riebold
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1965 |
| Year | 1965 |
| Court | Assizes |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
30 cases
-
Jerome Dixon v R
...process. In particular, the dicta of Lord Hutton on pages 493C and 497 where reference was made to the cases of Conelly, Sambasivam and R v Riebold [1967] 1 WLR 674. Learned counsel also referred to the cases of R v Wangige [2020] EWCA Crim 1319 and R v Beedie [1998] QB 37 In conclusion,......
-
Cosgrave v DPP and Another
...R v Elrington (1861) 1 B & S 688; R v Green (1825) 1 Craw and Dix 158; R v Mattu [2009] EWCA Crim 1483, [2010] Crim LR 229; R v Riebold [1967] 1 WLR 674; State (McCormack) v Curran [1987] ILRM 225; Woodhouse v Consigna plc [2002] EWCA Civ 275, [2002] 1 WLR 2558 and Z v Director of Public Pr......
-
Cosgrave v DPP
...Cr. App. Rep. 183. R. v. Green (1825) 1 Craw. and Dix. 158. R. v. Mattu [2009] EWCA Crim 1483, [2010] Crim. L.R. 229. Reg. v. Riebold [1967] 1 W.L.R. 674; [1965] 1 All E.R. 653. Regina v. Stanton (5 Cox, Cr. Cas. 324). Regina v. Walker (2 Mrr. & R. 446). State (McCormack) v. Curran [1987] I......
-
R v Humphrys
...the prosecution can thereafter proceed with the indictment even if the judge in a proper exercise of his discretion refuses leave. Reg. v. Riehold and Another [1967] 1 W.L.R. 674 is an illustration of the practical application of the majority view in Connelly so as to avoid oppression. The......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL’S POWERS OVER CRIMINAL PROSECUTION
...view of each judge. 11 [1977] AC 1. 12 An instance given of such an exceptional case by Lord Edmund Davis in Humphrys is R v Riebold[1967] 1 WLR 674. 13 J.L1.J. Edwards, The Attorney-General, Politics and the Public Interest (1984) p129. The spectacular conflict in Gouriet v Union of Post O......