R v Rochdale MBC ex parte Milne (No.2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 2001 |
| Date | 2001 |
| Year | 2001 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
55 cases
- Moulton Parish Council and Another (Joint Claimants) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Forest Heath District Council (First Interested Party) Newmarket Horsemen's Group (Second Interested Party)
-
Dignity Funerals Ltd v Breckland District Council Thornalley Funeral Services Ltd (Interested Party)
...plan the proposal does or does not accord with it." This question involves an exercise of judgment by the decision-maker ( R v Rochdale MBC ex parte Milne (No. 2) [2001] 1 Env LR 22 at paragraph 48). Where policies pull in different directions the decision-maker is entitled to give greater ......
-
The King (on the application of Ashchurch Rural Parish Council) v Tewksbury Borough Council
...depending on the nature and characteristics of the project to be assessed. In R v Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council ex parte Milne [2001] Env LR 22, (“ Rochdale”) Sullivan J (as he then was) said at [H7] and [H8]: “If a particular kind of project was, by its very nature, not fixed at th......
- R (on the application of John Phillip Watson) v London Borough of Richmond upon Thames and Others
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Planning Permission
...accords with the development plan, looking at it as a whole; see R. v Rochdale MBC Ex p. Milne (No.2) [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin); [2001] Env. L.R.22; (2001) 81 P. & C.R.27 per Sullivan J at [46]– [48]. There may be some points in the plan which support the proposal but there may be some consid......
-
Appeals and Review of Planning Decisions
...with the Development Plan, looking at it as a whole – see R(Milne) v Rochdale MBC (No 2) [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin), [2001] JPL 470, [2001] Env LR 22, (2001) 81 P&CR 27, [2000] EG 103 per Sullivan J at [46]–[48]. There may be some points in the plan which support the proposal but there may be ......
-
Appeals and Statutory Review of Planning Decisions
...with the Development Plan, looking at it as a whole – see R(Milne) v Rochdale MBC (No 2) [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin), [2001] JPL 470, [2001] Env LR 22, (2001) 81 P&CR 27, [2000] EG 103 per Sullivan J at [46]–[48]. There may be some points in the plan which support the proposal but there may be ......
-
Table of Cases
...Council [2013] EWHC 1908 (Admin), [2013] JPL 1551 455, 456 R (Milne) v Rochdale MBC (No 2) [2000] EWHC 650 (Admin), [2001] JPL 470, [2001] Env LR 22, (2001) 81 P&CR 27, [2000] EG 103 480 Page 47 Table of Cases xlvii R (Milton (Peterborough) Estates Co (t/a Fitzwilliam (Malton) Estate) v......
Get Started for Free