R v Rotherham Licensing Justices; ex parte Chapman
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | King's Bench Division |
| Year | 1939 |
| Date | 1939 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
- Hong Cheok Lam v Ong Sing Mai and Others
- R v Koh Hai Sui
-
R v Brighton Borough Justices. ex parte Jarvis
...licence is expedient for the convenience and accommodation of the public ….” F2*[1952] 2 All E.R. 700. F3† (1939) 55 T.L.R. 718; [1939] 2 All E.R. 710. F4‡ [1940] 2 K.B. 261; 56 T.L.R. 790; [1940] 3 All E.R. F5[1891] A.C. 173; 7 T.L.R. 389. F6[1897] A.C. 556; 13 T.L.R. 538. F7(1939) 55 T.L.......
-
Burke v The Minister for Labour
...3 C.L.R. 100. 3 R. v. Central Professional Committee for OpticiansUNK [1949] 2 All E.R. 519. 4 R. v. Rotherham Licensing JusticesUNK [1939] 2 All E.R. 710. Constitution - Statute - Validity - Delegated legislation - Natural justice - Fair procedures - Invalidity at common law - Minimum wage......
Get Started for Free