R v Russell

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal
Date1952
Year1952

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
16 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • THE WORKPLACE SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT: AN OVERVIEW
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2007, December 2007
    • 1 December 2007
    ...in our language can and often does convey that meaning.” See also, R v Senior[1899] 1 QB 283 at 290. 128 See for instance, R v Bates[1952] 2 All ER 842 at 845, “The term ‘recklessly’, I think, does not really give rise to much difficulty. It means something more than mere negligence or inad......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 53-1, January 1980
    • 1 January 1980
    ...creating a risk would be within thedefinition of reckless.Thatwas the view taken in Andrews v. D. P.P.[1937] A.C. 571andR. v. Bates [1952] 2 All E.R. 842.Itwas to befoundtooin civil cases - Shawingan Ltd. v. Vokins &Co. Ltd.[1961] 1 W.L.R. 1206.Howeverotherprecedents point towards asubjecti......
  • KNOWING, NOT KNOWING AND ALMOST KNOWING: KNOWLEDGE AND THE DOCTRINE OF MENS REA
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2008, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...64 [1997] 3 SLR 922. 65 Hans Tjio, Principles and Practice of Securities Regulation in Singapore (Singapore: LexisNexis, 2004). 66 [1952] 2 All ER 842. 67 (1889) 14 App Cas 337. 68 Australian Corporation Law: Principles and Practice, Vol 2 (Butterworths, 1991) at pp 73 and 197. 69 [1959] AC......