R v Russell, ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1968
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • R v Blackpool Justices, ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Accordingly, the justices were wrong to make the purported order of restriction under section 3 (1), and the order of certiorari would, nevertheless go in the circumstances, but the order of mandamus was unnecessary, for the original order under section 3 (2) was still valid ... Reg. v. Russell, Ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd. [1969] 1 Q.B. 342, D.C. and Reg. v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Kray (Reginald) [1969] 1 Q.B. 473, D.C. applied ... The following cases are referred to in the judgments: ... Reg. v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Kray (Reginald) [1969] 1 Q.B. 473, [1968] ... ...
  • R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 9 April 1981
    ...to mandamus, that he must have a specific legal right ( Reg. v. Guardians of Lewisham Union [1897] 1 Q.B. 498, Reg. v. Russell [1969] 1 Q.B. 342); sometimes that he must have a sufficient interest ( Reg. v. Cotham [1898] 1 Q.B. 802,804 (mandamus), Ex parte Stott [1916] 1 K.B. 7 (certior......
  • R v Horsham Justices, ex parte Farquharson
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 December 1981
    ...permitting all the committal proceedings to be reported as against all the accused, see Reg. v. Russell, ex parte Beaverbrook (1969) 1 Queen's Bench 342. 4As a matter of interest, I may say that it is different now. When proceedings are commenced after the 2nd October, 1981 the other accus......
  • R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 9 April 1981
    ...to mandamus, that he must have a specific legal right ( Reg. v. Guardians of Lewisham Union [1897] 1 Q.B. 498, Reg. v. Russell [1969] 1 Q.B. 342); sometimes that he must have a sufficient interest ( Reg. v. Cotham [1898] 1 Q.B. 802,804 (mandamus), Ex parte Stott [1916] 1 K.B. 7 (certior......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT