R v Russell, ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1968 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
R v Blackpool Justices, ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd
... ... Accordingly, the justices were wrong to make the purported order of restriction under section 3 (1), and the order of certiorari would, nevertheless go in the circumstances, but the order of mandamus was unnecessary, for the original order under section 3 (2) was still valid ... Reg. v. Russell, Ex parte Beaverbrook Newspapers Ltd. [1969] 1 Q.B. 342, D.C. and Reg. v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Kray (Reginald) [1969] 1 Q.B. 473, D.C. applied ... The following cases are referred to in the judgments: ... Reg. v. Bow Street Magistrate, Ex parte Kray (Reginald) [1969] 1 Q.B. 473, [1968] ... ...
-
R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
...to mandamus, that he must have a specific legal right ( Reg. v. Guardians of Lewisham Union [1897] 1 Q.B. 498, Reg. v. Russell [1969] 1 Q.B. 342); sometimes that he must have a sufficient interest ( Reg. v. Cotham [1898] 1 Q.B. 802,804 (mandamus), Ex parte Stott [1916] 1 K.B. 7 (certior......
-
R v Horsham Justices, ex parte Farquharson
...permitting all the committal proceedings to be reported as against all the accused, see Reg. v. Russell, ex parte Beaverbrook (1969) 1 Queen's Bench 342. 4As a matter of interest, I may say that it is different now. When proceedings are commenced after the 2nd October, 1981 the other accus......
-
R v Commissioners of Inland Revenue, ex parte National Federation of Self-Employed and Small Businesses Ltd
...to mandamus, that he must have a specific legal right ( Reg. v. Guardians of Lewisham Union [1897] 1 Q.B. 498, Reg. v. Russell [1969] 1 Q.B. 342); sometimes that he must have a sufficient interest ( Reg. v. Cotham [1898] 1 Q.B. 802,804 (mandamus), Ex parte Stott [1916] 1 K.B. 7 (certior......
Request a trial to view additional results