R v S (Trade Mark Defence)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date2003
Year2003
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Sheldrake v DPP
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 October 2004
    ...... 200 which had "definitely and exceptionally" placed an onus on the accused to establish a defence of insanity. He further acknowledged (p 481) that his statement of principle was "subject also to ......
  • 香港特別行政區 訴 黃玉和
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 5 December 2011
    ...v Hung Chan Wa and another [2006] 3 HKLRD 841, AG v Fong Chin-yue (1995) 1 HKC 21, HKSAR v Lam Kwong-wai (2006) 9 HKCFAR 574, R v S [2003] 1 Cr App R 35, AG v Lee Kwong-kut [1993] AC [21] [2008] 4 HKLRD 176。 [22] 《基本法》第87(2) 條和《香港人權法案條例》第8條第11(1) 款。 [23]...
  • Hksar v Lau Hok Tung And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • High Court (Hong Kong)
    • 5 January 2011
    ...does not suffice” : Ng Po On at para. 52. So the dividing line is drawn firmly in favour of a defendant. 28. Ms Chan relied on R v S [2003] 1 Cr App R 35. In that case the English Court of Appeal dealt with issues, similar to those arising in the present case, concerning section 92(1)(c) of......
  • R v Lloyd Allen
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 3 February 2005
    ...alternative argument that a sentence of three years' imprisonment was excessive. He referred us to the guideline case of R v McInerney [2003] 1 Cr App R 35. He points to the plea and the co-operation of the applicant in regard to the other offences of burglary. He emphasises that the applic......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT