R v S (Trade Mark Defence)
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 2003 |
Year | 2003 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
Sheldrake v DPP
...... 200 which had "definitely and exceptionally" placed an onus on the accused to establish a defence of insanity. He further acknowledged (p 481) that his statement of principle was "subject also to ......
-
香港特別行政區 訴 黃玉和
...v Hung Chan Wa and another [2006] 3 HKLRD 841, AG v Fong Chin-yue (1995) 1 HKC 21, HKSAR v Lam Kwong-wai (2006) 9 HKCFAR 574, R v S [2003] 1 Cr App R 35, AG v Lee Kwong-kut [1993] AC [21] [2008] 4 HKLRD 176。 [22] 《基本法》第87(2) 條和《香港人權法案條例》第8條第11(1) 款。 [23]...
-
Hksar v Lau Hok Tung And Others
...does not suffice” : Ng Po On at para. 52. So the dividing line is drawn firmly in favour of a defendant. 28. Ms Chan relied on R v S [2003] 1 Cr App R 35. In that case the English Court of Appeal dealt with issues, similar to those arising in the present case, concerning section 92(1)(c) of......
-
R v Lloyd Allen
...alternative argument that a sentence of three years' imprisonment was excessive. He referred us to the guideline case of R v McInerney [2003] 1 Cr App R 35. He points to the plea and the co-operation of the applicant in regard to the other offences of burglary. He emphasises that the applic......
Request a trial to view additional results