R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Chinoy
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 10 April 1991 |
| Date | 10 April 1991 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
34 cases
-
C.S. v Minister for Justice
...V DPP & MCGUINNESS 2002 2 IR 369 2003 1 ILRM 81 2002/12/2907 ADAM V MIN JUSTICE 2001 2 ILRM 452 R V SECRETARY OF STATE EX PARTE CHINOY 1991 COD 381 REFUGEE ACT 1996 S17(1)(B) Synopsis: - [2005] 1 ILRM 81 Facts: the applicants were granted leave to apply for judicial review by the High Co......
-
Gordon v DPP
...have been set aside. Citations: G V DPP 1994 1 IR 374 ADAM V MIN FOR JUSTICE 2001 2 ILRM 452 R V SECRETARY OF STATE , EX PARTE CHINOY 1991 COD 381 O" CALLAGHAN V O" HUADHAIGH 1977 IR 42 FLYNN V DPP 1986 ILRM 294 MURPHY V DPP 1989 ILRM 71 HOGAN & MORGAN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW IN IRELAND 3ED ......
-
R v Rimas Venclovas
...judge held that there was no evidence of bad faith and that, applying the observations of Nolan J (as he then was) in R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Chinoy [1992] 1 All ER 317 at page 332, any breach could carry no more weight than breaches of English law. In the circumstances......
-
Adam v Minister for Justice
...WOLFE & JOWELL JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION 667 PARA 15.025 R V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT EX PARTE CHINOY 1991 COD 381 R V SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE HOME DEPARTMENT EX PARTE TURGUT 2001 AER 719 RSC O.19 SCHMIDT V HOME SECRETARY OF THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED K......
Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
-
The extradition and return of fugitive offenders - applicability of human rights considerations
...by unlawful means as "legitimate", 59 which does not easily accord with the "philosophy" 60 of Bennett. On the other hand, even 56 [1992] 1 All E.R. 317. 57 Ibid., at 332, per Nolan J. (as he then was), 58 Ibid., at 332-333. 59 "I consider that the magistrate was fully entitled to reach his......
-
Undercover Operations and White Collar Crime
...the United States is helping to spread undercover investigations worldwide.' 9 R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, exparte Chinoy(1992) 1 All ER 317. 10 'Undercover Surveillance Did Not Breach Applicant's Rights', The Times Law Report, 13th August, 1992. 11 Nolan J, In Re Chinoy, ref. 9 abo......
Request a trial to view additional results