R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Naheed Ejaz
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 03 December 1993 |
| Date | 03 December 1993 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Tohura Bibi and Others v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka
...to Megaw L.J. at 58B, had not depended on any suggested distinction between “void” and “voidable” registrations. 19 And, third, R v. SSHD ex p. Naheed Ejaz [1994] QB 496. The court allowed an appeal against a judge's refusal to declare that the applicant was a British citizen and to quash t......
-
M v The Minister for Foreign Affairs
... ... friend had been physically present in the State for the period required by s. 6A of the Irish ... ...
-
R Hysaj v R Bakijasi and Others
...language of section 40(3): see [41] and [71]–[70]. 21 The judge reviewed other relevant decisions, including R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex p. Nahood Ejaz [1994] QB 496, Tohura Bibi v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka [2007] EWCA Civ 740 and R (Khadria and Krasniqui) v Secr......
-
The Home Office v TR
...is contrary to authority that the acquisition of citizenship by birth is automatic and requires no conferral ( R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, Ex parte Naheed Ejaz [1994] QB 496 at 501G). The Home Office's muddled position has not been 18 Section 3(8) of the Immigration Act......
Get Started for Free
