R v Secretary of State for Health, ex parte Furneaux

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
16 cases
  • Ackermon v CI Govt
    • Cayman Islands
    • Grand Court
    • 1 May 2013
    ...434; [1990] C.O.D. 243, applied. (9) R. v. Ebanks, ex p.Henderson, 2009 CILR 48, referred to. (10) R. v. Health Secy., ex p.Furneaux, [1994] 2 All E.R. 652; (1993), 17 BMLR 49, applied. (11) R. v. Housing Benefit Review Bd. of Borough of Milton Keynes, ex p.Macklen, English Q.B.D., April 30......
  • Whitstable Society v Canterbury City Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 15 February 2017
    ...that would result from the quashing, results also from the delay. It does not, or course, need to-that was precisely the point decided in Furneaux [1994] 2 All ER 652. It is, perhaps, unlikely that it will; the period of delay in applying for leave is likely to be far shorter than the subse......
  • R Restormel Borough Council ex parte Parkyn R Restormel Borough Council ex parte Corbett
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 September 2000
    ...from the quashing, results also from the delay. It does not, of course, need to �that was precisely the point decided in Furneaux [1994] 2 All E.R. 652. It is, perhaps, unlikely that it will; be period of delay in applying for leave is likely to be far shorter than the subsequent time taken......
  • R Restormel Borough Council ex parte Corbett R Restormel Borough Council ex parte Parkyn
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 September 2000
    ...from the quashing, results also from the delay. It does not, of course, need to �that was precisely the point decided in Furneaux [1994] 2 All E.R. 652. It is, perhaps, unlikely that it will; be period of delay in applying for leave is likely to be far shorter than the subsequent time taken......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Time Limitations on Applications for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...for the Environment; Ex parte Ostler [1977] and cases referred to above n 44. 71 R v Secretary of State for Health; Ex parte Furneaux [1994] 2 All ER 652, 658. 72 See, eg, ibid. 2004 Time Limitations on Applications for Judicial Review 43 ____________________________________________________......
  • Time Limitations on Applications for Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 32-1, March 2004
    • 1 March 2004
    ...for the Environment; Ex parte Ostler [1977] and cases referred to above n 44. 71 R v Secretary of State for Health; Ex parte Furneaux [1994] 2 All ER 652, 658. 72 See, eg, ibid. 2004 Time Limitations on Applications for Judicial Review 43 ____________________________________________________......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT