R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ali
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 2000 |
Date | 2000 |
Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
33 cases
-
Upper Tribunal (Immigration and asylum chamber), 2006-10-10, [2006] UKAIT 75 (LD (Article 14, Same-sex relationships))
...of social policy in determining whether the differential treatment was justified. She relied on passages in R v SSHD ex parte Arman Ali [2000] INLR 89 and R (Lekstaka) v IAT and SSHD [2005] EWHC 745 (Admin) in support of this submission (see paras 41 and 42 of the appellant’s skeleton). She......
-
ZN (Afghanistan) and Others v Entry Clearance Officer and Another
...MB (Somalia) [2008] EWCA Civ 102, at paragraph 59: “Like Dyson LJ (paragraph 24) I disagree with Collins J's insistence [sc. in Arman Ali 2000] INLR 89, 102B] on a purposive construction of the Immigration Rule, if it is thought that such an approach would produce a result in any way differ......
-
R (on the Application of MM) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [Admin Ct]
...R v Immigration Appeal Tribunal ex parte Manshoora Begum [1986] Imm AR 385 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte Ali [2000] Imm AR 134; [2000] INLR 89 R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex parte DalyUNK [2001] UKHL 26; [2001] 2 AC 532; [2001] 2 WLR 1622; [2001]......
-
Mahad v Entry Clearance Officer (sub noms AM (Ethiopia) v Entry Clearance Officer & AM (Somalia) v Entry Clearance Officer)
...because it did not say anything about who was to maintain the child ”. Tuckey LJ cited the Administrative Court's decision in Arman Ali [2000] INLR 89, where Collins J had so construed the unamended 22 As for Rule 297 in its present form, Tuckey LJ noted (paragraph 11) the submission of Mr......
Request a trial to view additional results