R v Secretary of State for Education and Science ex parte Davis

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1989
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
5 cases
  • E (A Minor) v Dorset CC, C v Hampshire CC
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...County Council ex parte Grieg (1988) The Independent, 1 June. R v Secretary of State for Education and Science, ex parte Davis [1989] 2 FLR 190. R v Secretary of State for Employment; ex parte Equal Opportunities Commission [1994] 2 WLR 409; [1994] 1 All ER 910. R v Surrey County Council Ed......
  • M and Another v London Borough of Newham and Others; X and Others v Bedfordshire County Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 29 April 1994
    ...rule out a claim for damages, but he left little room for one. 57In R v Secretary of State for Education and Science ex parte Davis [1989] 2 FLR 190 the Queen's Bench Divisional Court (Watkins LJ and Auld J) held that the Secretary of State had no power to make any order which would have th......
  • Richardson v Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council White v Ealing London Borough Council ; Hereford and Worcester County Council v Lane
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
    ...342. R v London Borough of Hackney, ex p GC [1995] ELR 144; affd [1996] ELR 142, CA. R v Secretary of State for Education, ex p Davis [1989] 2 FLR 190, S (a minor) v Special Educational Needs Tribunal[1996] 2 FCR 310, [1996] 1 All ER 171, [1995] 1 WLR 1627. Secretary of State for Employment......
  • Amanda Duncan v Bedfordshire County Council and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 13 December 1996
    ...for the child in the future. In support of this proposition, Mr Friel relies on R v Secretary of State for Education, ex parte Davis [1989] 2 FLR 190. It should be pointed out that this was a decision under the Education Act 1981, whose provisions were materially different from those of the......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT