R v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another, ex parte Kirkstall Valley Campaign Ltd

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQBD (Crown Office List)
Judgment Date06 March 1996
Date06 March 1996

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
48 cases
  • Majlis Perbandaran Pulau Pinang v Syarikat Bekerjasama-sama Serbaguna Sungai Gelugor Dengan Tanggungan
    • Malaysia
    • Supreme Court (Malaysia)
    • Invalid date
  • Peter Sanders and Another v Airports Commission and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • December 2, 2013
    ...ignorant of the allegedly disqualifying interest:" 62 The other case relied upon is that of R v Secretary of State for the Environment and Another Ex Parte Kirkstall Valley Campaign Limited (1996) 3 All ER 304 at page 328 (a) (b) where Sedley J said: "Participation can manifestly be more th......
  • Dukes Bailiffs Ltd v Breckland Council
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division (Technology and Construction Court)
    • June 26, 2023
    ...applied to the instant facts, Good Law referred to R (ex p Kirkstall Valley Campaign Ltd) v Secretary of State for the Environment) [1996] 3 All ER 304. The relevant question in that case was whether a decision to grant outline planning permission was tainted by bias on the basis that the ......
  • Condron v National Assembley for Wales
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • November 27, 2006
    ...and weighing of relevant factors. The cases include R v Secretary of State for the Environment, ex p Kirkstall Valley Campaign Ltd [1996] 3 All ER 304 at 320–321, Bovis Homes Ltd v New Forest Plc [2002] EWHC 483 (Admin) at paras 111–113, and R (Island Farm Development Ltd) v Bridgend County......
  • Get Started for Free