R v Shakeel Khan
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE PILL |
| Judgment Date | 06 March 2001 |
| Neutral Citation | [2001] EWCA Crim 486 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 06 March 2001 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 2000/1163/Y5 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
DPP v Curran
...IECCA 153, (Unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal, 5th December, 2006). R. v. Duffy [1949] 1 All E.R. 932. R. v. Khan (Shakeel) [2001] EWCA Crim. 486, [2001] Crim L.R. 673 R. v. Mawgridge (1708) Kel. 119; 84 E.R. 1107. R. v. Miah [2003] EWCA Crim 3713, [2003] All E.R. (D) 357 (Dec). R. v. Ri......
-
R v Seaton (Oral)
...52 Cr App R 28 that all that ought normally to be said is that neither side had called the witness. But as this court explained in R v Shakeel Khan [2001] EWCA Crim 486, each case depends upon its facts and it may be entirely fair to comment on a witness not being called where the evidence ......
-
R v Campbell (Jason)
...to explain why witnesses of fact or expert witnesses were not called? 30 Mr Larkin referred us to the decision of this court in R v Shakeel Khan [2001] EWCA Crim 486, in which Pill LJ reviewed the case law on the directions a judge should give if an issue arises concerning an alleged failur......
-
R v Makango Malondji
...are a number of authorities which dealt with this issue. Perhaps the one which is most regularly referred to is R v Shakeel Khan [2001] EWCA Crim. 486, a decision reached by a court consisting of Pill LJ, McCombe J and His Honour Judge Mettyear. The relevant observations that were made by P......