R v Sharmpal Singh; The Queen v Sharmpal Singh
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1962 |
| Date | 1962 |
| Year | 1962 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
35 cases
-
Public Prosecutor v Tan Joo Cheng and Others
... ... , we adopt the test laid down by V Bose J in Virsa Singh v State of Punjab AIR 1958 SC 465 at p 467, and he said: ... ...
-
Registrar of the Supreme Court (NT) v Nationwide News Pty Ltd and Another
...came to the conclusion, in considering the case against Trohear, the secretary of the union, that he had failed to 52R v Sharmpal Singh[1962] AC 188 at 198.53[2001] 2 Qd R 118.take proper steps to ensure compliance with the undertaking. The evidence on which his Honour based that conclusion......
-
Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing & Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
...Sydney District Rugby League Football Club (2003) 215 CLR 563discussed R v Hillier (2007) 233 ALR 634 discussed Reg v Sharmpal Singh [1962] AC 188 discussed Rejfek v McElroy (1965) 112 CLR 517 discussed Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129discussed Roya......
-
Donnason Knights Appellant v The Queen Respondent [ECSC]
...judge is bound to leave it for the jury's consideration regardless of whether or not the defence relied on it. [SeeRegina v Shampal Singh (1962) AC 188, Mancini v Director of Public Prosecutions (1941) AC 1H.L. Rex v Hopper 1915 2 K.B. 431 (1915 2 K.B. 431 Stephen Mongroo v The queen Crimin......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
The evidentiary value of an accused’s invocation of the pre-trial and trial right to silence through Anglo-American case law
...t he door for the prosecution to com ment on the accused ’s use of silence?111 R v Noble supra note 4 0 at 887–8; R v Shar mpal Singh [1962] AC 188 at 244–5. 112 C McCorm ick ‘Some problem s and development s in the adm issibil ity of confession s’ (1946) 24 Texas LR 239 at 277. Twining v N......
-
NWEDE V. THE STATE
...The State v. John Umunu, (1968) N.M.L.R. 15 at 20 6. Clark Ejurem v. C.O.P., (1961) All N.L.R. 478 7. The Queen v. Sharmpal Singh PC, (1962) 2 W.L.R. 238 8. R. v. Duffy, (1949) 1 All E.R. 932 50 9. Holmes v. D.P.P., (1946) 2 All E.R. 124 10. Ewo Akang v. The State, (1970) 1 N.M.L.R. 36 at 3......
