R v Shephard

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1919
Date1919
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Attorney General's Reference (No. 3 of 1994)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 24 July 1997
    ...is there any useful analogy with the setting of a time-bomb before a birth which explodes afterwards and kills the newborn child, cf. Rex v. Shephard [1919] 2 K.B. 125, at p. 126: for there was in that case an intention that the living child should be killed, which S was 73My Lords, if I h......
  • Wilson v Minister for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Affairs
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • B, Re, (1997) 220 N.R. 1 (HL)
    • Canada
    • 24 July 1997
    ...[1993] Q.B. 204 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 39]. R. v. Kwok Chak Ming (1963), H.K.L.R. 226, not folld. [para. 43]. R. v. Shephard, [1919] 2 K.B. 125, refd to. [para. McCluskey v. H.M. Advocate, [1989] S.L.T. 175, dist. [para. 66]. R. v. Larkin (1942), 29 Cr. App. Rep. 18, refd to. [para. 67]. D......
  • R v Tait
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 26 April 1989
    ...plain from the transcript of the submissions that the argument took this shape because the attention of counsel was concentrated on Shephard (1919) 2 K.B. 125, the only authority anywhere close to the point which it had proved possible to find. 23 In Shephard, which was brought under sectio......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT