R v Sheridan

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
Date1936
Year1936

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
44 cases
  • Richards v The Queen
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 19 October 1992
    ...that any court sustained a plea of autrefois convict on the basis of a finding of guilt alone. The first such case was R v SheridanELR ([1937] 1 KB 223), which was followed in R v GrantUNK ([1936] 2 All ER 1156) Those two cases represented the high watermark of Mr Thornton's submissions. Bu......
  • New Tuck Shen v PP
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1981
  • R v Guest, ex parte Anthony
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... Rex v. Sheridan [1937] 1 K.B. 223; 52 T.L.R. 626; [1936] 2 All E.R. 883, C.C.A., and Rex v. Grant (1936) 100 J.P. 324, C.C.A. applied ... Reg. v. Durham Quarter Sessions, Ex parte Virgo [1952] 2 Q.B. 1; [1952] 1 T.L.R. 516; [1952] 1 All E.R. 466, D.C. distinguished ... APPLICATION for orders of certiorari and ... ...
  • R v Campbell. ex parte Hoy
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... In purporting to remand the prisoner on bail for the case to be re-heard the magistrate had exceeded her jurisdiction and an order of prohibition would lie ... Rex v. Manchester Justices; ex parte Lever [1937] 2 K.B. 96; 53 T.L.R. 687; [1937] 3 All E.R. 4 and Rex v. Sheridan [1937] 1 K.B. 223; 52 T.L.R. 626; [1936] 2 All E.R. 883 applied ... APPLICATION for an order of prohibition ... Mrs. Rose Lilian Lawford appeared at Tower Bridge Magistrates' Court on December 18, 1952, charged with knowingly harbouring certain uncustomed goods, to wit, 262 pairs of American ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Courts of Summary Jurisdiction
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 14-3, July 1950
    • 1 July 1950
    ...provisions oftheAct, were designedtoavoidthedifficulties in which magistrates' courts foundthemselves afterthedecision in R. v. Sheridan (1937, 1K.B.223)andR. v. Grant (1936, 2AllE.R. 1156).Theeffect of these decisions wasthatifon hearing oftheprisoner'spastrecordthemagistrates considered t......
  • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 8-1, January 1944
    • 1 January 1944
    ...COURT OF CRIMINALAPPEAL39thejustices were entitled,ifnotactually bound, tohearthatevidence.Thematteris dealtwithin R. v. Sheridan(1937, 1K.B.223).Nevertheless,itwas said inthejudgment,therearealways risksthattheprevious record oftheaccused may,either through being readoutin court, or, as in......