R v Simpson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 23 May 2003 |
| Neutral Citation | [2003] EWCA Crim 1499 |
| Date | 23 May 2003 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
75 cases
- R v Teeside Crown Court ex parte Gazette Media Company Ltd
-
R v Aloke Varma and Others
...if the decision in Clarke is wrong, we are bound by it. We fully appreciate the practical value of the approach adopted by this court in R v Simpson [2004] QB 118, underlining the discretion available to a five judge constitution of the court, circumspectly exercised, to decide that a prev......
-
R v BR (Sentencing: Extended Licences
...concluding that we may properly consider that decision as per incuriam, we have had regard to the guidance given recently by this court in R v Simpson [2003] EWCA Crim 1499 in relation to the modern doctrine of per incuriam in criminal cases. 31 Lord Woolf CJ giving the judgment of a five j......
-
S v S
...(AIRE Centre intervening) [2016] UKSC 15; [2016] 2 WLR 1103; [2016] 1 FLR 1082, SC(E)Quinn v Leathem [1901] AC 495, HL(NI)R v Simpson [2003] EWCA Crim 1499; [2004] QB 118; [2003] 3 WLR 337; [2003] 3 All ER 531, CARolls-Royce plc v Unite the Union [2009] EWCA Civ 387; [2010] 1 WLR 318; [2010......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 books & journal articles
-
ENLARGED PANELS IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF SINGAPORE
...v The Queen [1964] 1 AC 900; R v Arkle (1972) 56 Cr App R 722; R v Watson [1988] 1 QB 690; Taylor v Lawrence [2003] QB 528; R v Simpson [2004] QB 118; Attorney General's Reference (No 1 of 2004) [2004] 1 WLR 2111; Matthew v State of Trinidad and Tobago [2005] 1 AC 433; Attorney General for ......
-
Court of Appeal
...had not been before the court in its earlier decision. This maywell be in line with one interpretation of the decision in R vSimpson[2004] QB 118 where the court discussed whether all the relevantauthority had been presented before the earlier court and ruled that theCourt of Appeal (Crimin......
-
Consenting to Prosecutions: The Legal Consequences of Non-compliance With the Requirement
...the Public Order Act 1986 was verymuch in line with past authorities, as will be shown below. In contrast to the decision in R v Simpson[2004] QB 118 (referred to by Gillespie and Weare), where a per curiam issue relating to the interpret-ation of the law contrary to a previous authority wa......
-
Consenting to Prosecutions: The Legal Consequences of Non-compliance With the Requirement
...the Public Order Act 1986 was verymuch in line with past authorities, as will be shown below. In contrast to the decision in R v Simpson[2004] QB 118 (referred to by Gillespie and Weare), where a per curiam issue relating to the interpret-ation of the law contrary to a previous authority wa......
Request a trial to view additional results