R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Dixon

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1997
Year1997
CourtQueen's Bench Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
34 cases
  • The Queen (on the Application of All the Citizens) v Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 Abril 2022
    ...review. 108 It is in this context that, in our view, the celebrated dictum of Sedley J in R v Somerset County Council, ex parte Dixon [1998] Env LR 111, at 121, should be understood: “Public law is not at base about rights, even though abuses of power may and often do invade private rights;......
  • Hunt v North Somerset Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 22 Julio 2015
    ...public factors to consider. Public law is not about private rights but about public wrongs, as Sedley J said in R v Somerset County Council, Ex p Dixon [1998] Env LR 111 when considering a question of standing. A court may refuse permission to bring a judicial review claim if it considers t......
  • Forbes v Aberdeenshire Council
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Outer House)
    • Invalid date
  • R (Howard League for Penal Reform) v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 29 Noviembre 2002
    ...for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs ex p World Development Movement Ltd [1995] 1 WLR 386 and R v Somerset County Council ex p Dixon [1998] Env LR 111. 5 Children detained by the State 64. I am not concerned with those children whom the State detains for the purposes of psychiatric or othe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • United Kingdom
    • Wildy Simmonds & Hill Planning Law. A Practitioner's Handbook Contents
    • 30 Agosto 2019
    ...148 (CS), QBD 311 R v Shorrock [1994] QB 279, [1993] 3 WLR 698, [1993] 3 All ER 917, CA 573 R v Somerset County Council ex parte Dixon [1998] Env LR 111, (1998) 75 P & CR 175, [1997] JPL 1030, QBD 201 R v South Eastern Railway Co (1850) 16 LT (OS) 124 530 R v South Norfolk District Coun......
  • The Usual Suspects? Public Participation Under the Aarhus Convention
    • United Kingdom
    • Wiley The Modern Law Review No. 66-1, January 2003
    • 1 Enero 2003
    ...in two recentcases: RvNorth Somerset District Council ex parte Garnett [1998] Env LR 91 and RvSomersetDistrict Council ex parte Dixon [1998] Env LR 111.The Modern Law Review [Vol. 66102 rThe Modern Law Review Limited also of ‘substantive legality’. Procedural legality, which concerns the ch......
  • The 'Exceptionality' of Legal Aid: Affordable Access to Justice in Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • LSE Law Review No. 6-3, March 2021
    • 1 Marzo 2021
    ...may and often do invade private rights; it is about wrongs – that is to say misuses of public power,’ R v Somerset CC, ex parte Dixon [1998] Env LR 111 [121] (Sedley J). 27 See e.g. R (Glencore Energy UK Ltd.) v HMRC Revenue and Customs [2017] EWCA Civ 1716; Oyekan v Secretary of State for ......
  • Public Interest Litigants in the Court of Session
    • United Kingdom
    • Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh Law Review No. , May 2015
    • 1 Mayo 2015
    ...Sedley J) about public wrongs and the maintenance of the rule of law.5 5 R v Somerset County Council and ARC Southern Ltd ex p Dickson [1998] Env LR 111 at 121 per Sedley J. It would seem, however, that the Court of Session has so far pushed back against the public interest justification fo......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT