R v Southwark Crown Court, ex parte Godwin ; R v Same, ex parte The Daily Telegraph Plc ; R v Same, ex parte MGN Ltd ; R v Same, ex parte Associated Newspapers Ltd ; R v Same, ex parte Newspaper Publishing Plc
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 16 May 1991 |
| Date | 16 May 1991 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
JC and RT v The Central Criminal Court Crown Prosecution Service and Another (Interested Parties) Just for Kids Law (Intervener)
...111n, DC. R v Crown Court at Manchester, ex p H [2002] 2 All ER 166, [2000] 1 WLR 760, DC. R v Crown Court at Southwark, ex p Godwin [1991] 3 All ER 818, [1992] QB 190, [1991] 3 WLR 689, CA. R v Crown Court at Winchester, ex p B (a minor) [1999] 4 All ER 53, [1999] 1 WLR 788, DC. R v Greate......
-
R A v Lowestoft Magistrates' Court Crown Prosecution Service and Another (Interested Parties)
...... publication of certain matter in newspapers. (1) In relation to any proceedings in ... that— (a) no newspaper report of the proceedings shall reveal the name, ...In ex parte Godwin [1992] 1 QB 190 , the issue was whether ... case of preventing the media from publishing the name of the defendant. However, that was a ... and wives and partners all suffer in the same way. All this represents the further consequences ... Party), which publishes the Eastern Daily Press and the Lowestoft Journal, and for whom Ms ......
-
R v Central Criminal Court, ex parte Godwin and Crook
...the representative of the prosecution will remind the court of its power to make an order under Section 39. But in ex parte Godwin [1992] QB 190, 94 Cr App R 34, another appeal under Section 159 of the 1988 Act, this court quoted the trial Judge, Judge Laurie, in that case as saying: "It s......
-
A Council v M and Others (No 3)
...a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale. 40 It is well-established (see e.g. R v Southwark Crown Court ex p Godwin and others [1992] QB 190) that s.39 does not empower the Crown Court to make an order that a defendant's name should not be published but that, in practice, judges m......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Reporting Restrictions: Sexual Offences
...beyond the boundariesof s. 39 of Children and Young Persons Act 1933. These boundaries hadbeen expressed by Glidewell LJ in Ex p. Godwin [1992] QB 190 at 196H:[i]n our view section 39 as a matter of law does not empower a court toorder in terms that the names of defendants be not published.......
-
Identification Evidence: Duty to Conduct Identification Procedure
...beyond the boundariesof s. 39 of Children and Young Persons Act 1933. These boundaries hadbeen expressed by Glidewell LJ in Ex p. Godwin [1992] QB 190 at 196H:[i]n our view section 39 as a matter of law does not empower a court toorder in terms that the names of defendants be not published.......