R v St Edmundsbury BC ex parte Davidson
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1911 |
| Court | House of Lords |
| Date | 1911 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
78 cases
-
DPP v Nevin
... ... 3 WLR 831 1969 AER 941 1969 53 CAR 412 YOUNG & COUGHLAN 1976 63 CAR 37 IN EX PARTE TELEGRAPH PLC 1994 98 CAR 91 1993 1 WLR 980 CRIMINAL JUSTICE (ADMINISTRATION) ACT 1924 SCH ... ...
-
DPP v Independent News and Media Plc
... ... v. Duffy & Ors. Ex Parte Nash as a 'deliberate campaign' to influence the court and contained material, not merely false, ... ...
- DPP v McNeill
-
Harris v DPP
...case was a decision of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, but it was unanimously approved by the House of Lords in R. v. Ball [1911] A.C. 47 at p. 71 and has been constantly relied on ever since. It is, I think, an error to attempt to draw up a closed list of the sort of cases in ......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
The collateral evidence rule
...Tapper (1995: 335) (cf. Tapper (2010: 362)).12. (1982) 75 Cr App R 79.13. [1997] 2 Cr App R 401.14. See per Lord Atkinson in RvBall [1911] AC 47, affirmed in RvWilliams (1986) 84 Cr App R 229 and RvPhillips [2003] 2Cr App R 528 at [26].15. See RvBurke (1858) 8 Cox CC 44.16. See per Lord Sim......