R v Sunderland Justices
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1901 |
Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
56 cases
5 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...& Others 9. W.A.C.A. 23. 481 Rex v. Sala & Sati 4 W.A.C.A. 10. 643 Rex v. Sola Sati (1938) 3 WACA 10 599 Rex v. Sunderland Justices (1901) 2 K.B. 357 at 373 C.A. 64 Rex v. Sussex Justice Ex parte McCarthy (1924) 1 K.B. 256 at 259. 64 Roberts v. Holland (1893) 1 0 B 665 495 Robinson v. Chadw......
-
Table of Cases
...2014 SCC 43.............................................................................................. 2 R v Sunderland Justices, [1901] 2 KB 357 .............................................................. 116 R v Valente, [1985] 2 SCR 673, [1985] SCJ No 77 .................................
-
PRINCIPLE THAT A JUDGE MUST BE IMPARTIAL
...he should not sit. And if he does sit, his decision cannot stand; see Reg. v. Huggins (1895) 1 Q.B. 563 and Rex v. Sunder-land Justices (1901) 2 K.B. 357 at 373 C.A.) per Vangham Williams L.J. Nevertheless, there must appear to be a real likelihood of bias. Surmise or conjecture is not enou......
-
Table of Cases
...12 W.A.C.A. 455………….................................................................................153 Rex v. Sunderland Justices (1901) 2 K.B.357, C.A…...................................................………….550 Rex v. Zenvinula 12 W.A.C.A. 68………….................................................
Request a trial to view additional results