R v Sunderland Justices
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
| Date | 1901 |
| Year | 1901 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
52 cases
- Chong Chin Yuan v PP
- Ong Eng Guan for an order of prohibition, Re appointment of SHD Elias, Re Application by
- R v Eastern Traffic Area Licensing Authority, ex parte J. Wyatt Jnr. (Haulage) Ltd
-
The Gleaner Company Ltd v Michael Manley
...real likelihood of bias in the whole tribunal even though one member is so disabled. As A. L. Smith, M.R., said in R. v. Sunderland JJ. [1901] 2 K.B. 357 at p. 364: 70 L.J. 1 C.B. 946: “It appears to me that in cases where the decision of justices is impeached on the ground of likelihood o......
Get Started for Free
4 books & journal articles
-
Preliminary Sections
...& Others 9. W.A.C.A. 23. 481 Rex v. Sala & Sati 4 W.A.C.A. 10. 643 Rex v. Sola Sati (1938) 3 WACA 10 599 Rex v. Sunderland Justices (1901) 2 K.B. 357 at 373 C.A. 64 Rex v. Sussex Justice Ex parte McCarthy (1924) 1 K.B. 256 at 259. 64 Roberts v. Holland (1893) 1 0 B 665 495 Robinson v. Chadw......
-
INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND MULTI-NATIONAL CORPORATIONS PRACTICAL APPROACHES TO ARBITRATION THE HEARING: THE ROLES OF ARBITRAL PANEL AND COUNSEL
...there is the real danger or likelihood of bias test (see, for example Vaughan [Page 11C-25] Williams L.J. in Rex. v Sunderland Justices [1901] 2 K.B. 357, 371) which Lord Goff of Chieveley adopted in Reg. v. Gough [1993] A.C. 646, 670 and which has been followed in a number of English cases......
-
PRINCIPLE THAT A JUDGE MUST BE IMPARTIAL
...he should not sit. And if he does sit, his decision cannot stand; see Reg. v. Huggins (1895) 1 Q.B. 563 and Rex v. Sunder-land Justices (1901) 2 K.B. 357 at 373 C.A.) per Vangham Williams L.J. Nevertheless, there must appear to be a real likelihood of bias. Surmise or conjecture is not enou......
-
Table of Cases
...12 W.A.C.A. 455………….................................................................................153 Rex v. Sunderland Justices (1901) 2 K.B.357, C.A…...................................................………….550 Rex v. Zenvinula 12 W.A.C.A. 68………….................................................