R v Sussex Justices, ex parte McCarthy

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtKing's Bench Division
Judgment Date1923
Date1923
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
435 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Dealing with disgruntled students: a fine balancing act for educational institutions - part 1
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 Noviembre 2014
    ...requires, in essence, that "justice must both be done and be seen to be done". (In the case of R v Sussex Justices: Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1KB 256 at 259, Lord Hewart CJ emphasised the importance of procedural conduct in maintaining confidence.) It is the concern to avoid a practical inju......
  • Apprehended Bias And Adjudication Determinations
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 Junio 2009
    ...which provides that justice should not only be done, but should manifestly be seen to be done (R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256). In the adjudication process, would mean that the adjudicator should not only make the correct decision, but should also not engage in any s......
22 books & journal articles
  • The rule of law
    • Ireland
    • Irish Judicial Studies Journal Nbr. 1-8, January 2008
    • 1 Enero 2008
    ...of Civil Liberties in Times of Security Crises”, (1988) 18 Israel Yearbook of Human Rights 11. 51R v. Sussex Justices, Ex p McCarthy [1924] 1 K.B. 256, at 259. 52 Detroit Free Press v. Ashcroft 303 F 3d 681, at 683 (6th Cir. 2002). 53See, for example, R (Alconbury Developments Ltd) v. Secre......
  • Sub-regional Courts and the Recusal Issue: Emergent Practice of the East African Court of Justice
    • United Kingdom
    • African Journal of International and Comparative Law Nbr. , October 2012
    • 1 Octubre 2012
    ...on this is that justice must not only be done, but must also be seen to be done.66Lord Hewart CJ in R v Sussex Justices ex p McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256, 259; Lord Bingham of Cornhill in Davidson v Scottish Ministers [2004] UKHL 34, [7]; Frankfurter J, in Public Utilities Comission v Pollak (1......
  • The Great Depression, this Depression, and Administrative Law
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 37-2, June 2009
    • 1 Junio 2009
    ...92, and R F V Heuston, Lives of the Lord Chancellors, 1885–1940 (1964) 603. 58 The report of R v Sussex Justices; Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256, 259, has Hewart CJ making the famous statement that 'justice should not only be done, but should manifestly and undoubtedly be seen to be done......
  • Ireland and Judicial (In)dependence in Light of the Twenty-Ninth Amendment to the Constitution
    • Ireland
    • Trinity College Law Review Nbr. XVIII-2015, January 2015
    • 1 Enero 2015
    ...84 Anthony Dugdale and John Farrar, Introduction to Legal Method , (3 rd ed, Sweet and Maxwell, 1990). 85 R v Sussex JJ ex p McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256, at 259. 86 [1997] 3 SCR 3, at 88, para. 133. 87 [1997] 3 SCR 3, at 94, para. 147. 35 Trinity College Law Review [vol 18 The Court held that ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT