R v Tata Steel UK Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | Lord Justice Gross |
| Judgment Date | 07 June 2017 |
| Neutral Citation | [2017] EWCA Crim 704 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 07 June 2017 |
| Docket Number | Case No: 201603941 A4 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
6 cases
-
R v Diamond Box Ltd
...there was no sufficient basis for concluding that the likelihood of risk would be high. Relying on the observation of this court in Tata Steel UK Ltd [2017] EWCA Crim 704; [2017] Cr App R (S) 29 at [10], that "by itself, the period of operation without incident [15 years in that case] is a ......
-
R (Health and Safety Executive) v ATE Truck & Trailer Sales Ltd
...in this area have been considered on a number of occasions recently: see, R v Thames Water [2015] EWCA Crim 960; [2015] 1 WLR 4411; R v Tata Steel UK Ltd [ [2017] EWCA Crim 704; [2017] 2 Cr App R (S) 29; R v Diamond Box Limited [2017] EWCA Crim 1904; Whirlpool UK Appliances Ltd v R [ [20......
-
Whirlpool UK Appliances Ltd v R (Upon the Prosecution of HM Inspectors of Health and Safety)
...very large. Doubtful cases must be resolved as and when they arise.” 19 An obvious case concerning a very large organisation was R v Tata Steel UK Limited [2017] EWCA Crim 704. The appellant had a turnover of about £4 billion a year, and although a going concern was not at the time profitab......
-
Faltec Europe Ltd v Health and Safety Executive
...22 Further, there was no dispute that the correct general approach to the Guideline is, as set out by Gross LJ, in R v Tata Steel Ltd [2017] EWCA Crim 704; [2017] 2 Cr App R (S) 29, at [25]: “ Overview: Standing back from the detail, the following broad picture emerges of the Guideline as ......
Request a trial to view additional results