R v Terence James Frazier Silcock, David Levin
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judge | MR JUSTICE POOLE,THE VICE PRESIDENT |
Judgment Date | 29 January 2004 |
Neutral Citation | [2004] EWCA Crim 408 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
Docket Number | No: 200205168/A8-200301022/A8-200302050/A8 |
Date | 29 January 2004 |
To continue reading
Request your trial4 cases
-
R v Clipston (Vincent)
...14. There is an extant authority on the admission of hearsay in compensation cases coming before this court in the case of Silcott [2004] EWCA Crim 408. Mr Finch, who has appeared for the applicant today, suggests that the proper approach to the admission of evidence in confiscation proceed......
-
R v Ahmad and another
...in relation to certain issues at the confiscation hearing also did not infringe the Convention – see especially para 49. 8In R v Silcock and Levin [2004] EWCA Crim 408; [2004] 2 Cr App R (S) 61, para 60 and R v Clipston [2011] EWCA Crim 446; [2011] 2 Cr App R (S) 101, paras 57–60, the Cou......
-
R v Amolak Singh Chal
...strict definition of criminal proceedings advanced by Mr Baker, but to which the ordinary rules of criminal evidence do not apply. (See R v Silcock [2004] EWCA Crim 408 regarding confiscation proceedings.) 21 Secondly, the phrase could be construed more generally so as to include all procee......
-
R v David Mark Hackett
...judge addresses that in paragraphs 91 to 95 of her judgment. In paragraph 94 she sets out some observations of Poole J in the case of R v Silcock [2004] EWCA Crim 408. That deals with issues of the burden of proof to which we have already referred and then, in paragraph 95, the learned Reco......