R v The Justices of Surrey

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1865
Date1865
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
35 cases
  • Kam Gin Paik and Others v Pemungut Hasil Tanah Daerah Barat Daya, Pulau Pinang
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1983
  • GB Bull; L Stanley
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 Enero 1952
  • De Roiste v Minister for Defence
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 Enero 2001
    ...... 6 BURR 2458 REX V EATON 2 TR 89 MAYO PRESENTMENTS 14 IR CLR 392 R V NEWBOROUGH LR 4 QB 585 8 MOD R 331 R V JUSTICES OF SURREY LR 5 QB 472 HUNT, STATE V CIRCUIT JUDGE, MIDLAND CIRCUIT 1934 IR 196 VOZZA, STATE V O FLOINN 1957 IR 227 DEFENCE ......
  • Baldwin & Francis Ltd v Patents Appeal Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 14 Mayo 1959
    ...effect that where the applicant is a party grieved, who has no other remedy, the Court will grant it ex debito justitiae, see The Queen v. The Justices of Surrey (1870) L.R. 5 Q.B. 466; R. v. Manchester Legal Aid Committee [1952] 2 Q.B. 413. But if he is not a party grieved, or if, being ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • PERSON AGGRIEVED IS SYNONYMOUS WITH PERSON HAVING INTEREST
    • Nigeria
    • DSC Publications Online Sasegbon’s Judicial Dictionary of Nigerian Law. First edition P
    • 6 Febrero 2019
    ...of his own in respect of an order made under the Highway Act 1864, he was held to be a party aggrieved. See: R. v. Surrey ff. (1870) L.R. 5 Q.B. 466; and so, a trade rival was also held to have such an interest in a decision of Justices under the Alehouse Act 1828 as to constitute him a par......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT