R v Thomas Ibrahima
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LORD JUSTICE LAWS,LORD JUSTICE KEENE,DAME HEATHER STEEL |
| Judgment Date | 25 May 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] EWCA Crim 1436,[2005] EWCA Crim 444 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No: 200401125/C2,No: 200401125 C2 |
| Date | 25 May 2005 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
4 cases
-
Peter Chilvers v R
...any proceedings which might ensue, that of itself would be sufficient to justify conviction. 65 Similarly, as demonstrated in R v Ibrahima [2005] EWCA Crim 1436, the direction need not be given in a case involving an intent to supply controlled drugs when the jury could convict on the basis......
-
R v Roy John Phillips
...do not amount to different ingredients no Brown direction is required, eg in respect of an intent to supply controlled drugs ( R v Ibrahima [2005] EWCA Crim 1436; [2005] Crim LR 887, where the jury could convict on the basis of either social supply to a named friend, or commercial supply in......
-
R v Smith
...these alternatives it was: a Brown direction was not necessary." 35 A corresponding approach had been taken in the early case of R v Ibrahima [2005] Crim LR 887, a case of possession of drugs with intent to supply. 36 Turning to the present case, obviously a prosecution under section 16 of ......
-
R v Jasun Dale
...could have reached the judge's conclusion and in this context he referred to the decision of R v Nabil Ahmed 6 Cr.App.R (S) 391R v Ibrahima [2005] EWCA Crim. 1436 was that Mr Poulter did not "have the required scientific experience…or qualifications which would entitle him to proffer the op......