R v Twist

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Year2011
Date2011

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
3 cases
  • R v Billy Nathan Midmore
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 28 April 2017
    ...of the differently constituted court that heard the interlocutory appeal in this case (reported at [2015] EWCA Crim 1870 under the name of R v R). That view was reflected by Parliament in 2009 when it inserted s.33BA into the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act, as it provided for an in......
  • Imran Khan and Others v R
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 4 December 2013
    ...to believe the matter, or (b) to cause another person to act or a machine to operate on the basis that the matter is as stated." In Twist & Others this court considered these provisions in detail — see paragraph 3 to 17 of the judgment. At paragraph 17 the Vice President set out the app......
  • R v Stephen Jeremy Bache and Others
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 29 October 2014
    ... ... 16 In R v Singh [2006] EWCA Crim 660, [2006] 2 Cr App R 12 (page 201) at [14]; in R v Twist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143, [2011] 2 Cr App R 17 (page 189) at [9–12] and [17]; and in R v Mullings [2010] EWCA Crim 2820, [2011] 2 Cr App R 2 (page 21) at [20], this court emphasised that while the content of the statement will be hearsay, it does not follow that it is hearsay for the purpose of ... ...
2 books & journal articles
  • The Safety-Valve: Discretion to Admit Hearsay Evidence in Criminal Proceedings
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 76-4, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...vCole and Keet [2007] 1 WLR2716 at [6]–[7]; R v Horncastle [2009] UKSC 14, [2010] 2 AC 373 at [31] and R vTwist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143, [2011] 3 All ER 1055 at [22].14 R v Taylor [2006] 2 Cr App R 14 at [38]–[40]; R vY[2008] EWCA Crim 10, [2008]1 Cr App R 34 at [56]; R vZ[2009] 1 Cr App R 34......
  • Confessions and the Criminal Justice Act 2003
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 77-3, June 2013
    • 1 June 2013
    ...fall within the ambitof the definition of a confession in s. 82(1) of the 1984 Act86 and, thus, 79 R v Twist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143, [2011] 3 All ER 1055; R v Knight [2007] EWCA Crim 3027; R v N [2006] EWCA Crim 3309, (2007) 171 JP 158. 80 See, e.g., R v Twist [2011] EWCA Crim 1143, [2011] 3......