R v van Tattenhove
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | THE LORD CHIEF JUSTICE |
| Judgment Date | 30 November 1995 |
| Judgment citation (vLex) | [1995] EWCA Crim J1130-3 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Docket Number | No. 94/3452/Z2 |
| Date | 30 November 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
8 cases
-
Ronald Alan Main and Ronald William ; Johnson
...for the quantities in this case a sentence of substantially higher than 14 years is appropriate. 22 In the subsequent case of R v. Tattenhove and Doubtfire (1996) 2 Cr.App.R.(S.) 91, this Court, again presided over by the Lord Chief Justice, had to consider the appropriate levels of sentenc......
-
R v Christiana Akyeah
... ... 10 We were referred to three cases. The first is R v Tattenhove and Doubtfire [1996] 2 Cr App R(S) 91. This was a case in which the defendants were convicted of importing drugs concealed in a tanker prepared and accommodated by Doubtfire and driven by Tattenhove who had been involved in various dummy runs. The value of the drugs was far larger that this case ... ...
-
R v Karl Pettitt
...been 25 years, or at most 26. In support of that he relies on a number of well-known authorities, including in particular Tattenhove and Doubtfire [1996] 1 Cr App R 408 and Tyrell and others [2004] EWCA Crim 3279. 16 We do not accept his argument on this. There was a range of sentences avai......
- Hussein Jama and Austen Michael Oliver
Get Started for Free