R v W White

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1860
Date01 January 1860
CourtHigh Court

English Reports Citation: 175 E.R. 898

QUEEN'S BENCH, COMMON PLEAS AND EXCHEQUER

Regina
and
W White

regina v W white (In an indictment for receiving goods, knowing them to have been stolen, belief without actual knowledge is sufficient to sustain it) Receiving The prisoner was charged with receiving lead, the property of the Queen, he well knowing it to have been stolen Bramwell, B (to the jury) -The knowledge charged in this indictment need not be such knowledge as would be acquired if the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
2 cases
  • Rex v Patz
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Albow (1910 CPD 320 at 323); belief that the property was stolen is sufficient.; it is not necessary to prove knowledge; Regina v White (1 F. & F. 665); Rex v Joffe (1925 T.P.D. 86); Rex v Saffy and Bennett (1944 AD 391 at 411); Rex v Bhardu (1945,. AD 813 at 819) 1, Rex v Khan (1943 AD 324......
  • R v Grainge
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • 18 Diciembre 1973
    ...9 These two considerations naturally led to directions being given with a view to indicating that absolute certainty was not necessary, R. v. White in 1859 1 F. and F. 665, and to indicating the appropriate facts in a given case which might lead to an inference of knowledge. 10 Negligence o......