R v Wakefield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1918
CourtCourt of Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • DPP of the British Virgin Islands v Penn
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 8 d4 Maio d4 2008
    ...CAR 235, 244D). Deliberate impersonation of a juror by another person will in contrast lead to the verdict being set aside ( R v. Kelly; R v. Wakefield [1918] 1 KB 6 Challenges to the array relate to the process leading to the impanelling of the array. Such a challenge may be made on the b......
  • Director of Public Prosecutions v. Penn, [2008] N.R. Uned. 168
    • Canada
    • 8 d4 Maio d4 2008
    ...Deliberate impersonation of a juror by another person will in contrast lead to the verdict being set aside ( R v. Kelly ; R v. Wakefield [1918] 1 KB 216). [6] Challenges to the array relate to the process leading to the impanelling of the array. Such a challenge may be made on the basis of ......
  • Rex v Krasner
    • South Africa
    • Appellate Division
    • 28 d2 Março d2 1950
    ...Lal v The King-Emperor (1933 L.J., Vol. 102 (P.C.) at p. 146); Ellis v Deheer (1922 (2) K.B. at pp. 117 - 19, 121); Rex v Wakefield (1918 (1) K.B. 216); Rex v Thomas (102 L.J. (K.B.) at p. 646); Halsbury's Laws of England (Hailsham ed., Vol. 19, para. 659); Prior v Powers (83 E.R. at p. 125......
  • Rex v Krasner
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...Lal v The King-Emperor (1933 L.J., Vol. 102 (P.C.) at p. 146); Ellis v Deheer (1922 (2) K.B. at pp. 117 - 19, 121); Rex v Wakefield (1918 (1) K.B. 216); Rex v Thomas (102 L.J. (K.B.) at p. 646); Halsbury's Laws of England (Hailsham ed., Vol. 19, para. 659); Prior v Powers (83 E.R. at p. 125......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Court of Criminal Appeal
    • United Kingdom
    • Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 14-3, July 1950
    • 1 d6 Julho d6 1950
    ...an alienandone in whichitarisesbyreason of his being convicted. R. v. Mellor (1858,Dearsc8-B. 468)andR. v. Wakefield (1918 1K.B.216)areother cases of personation or mistake in which a newtrialwas ordered.TheattentionoftheCourt was, how-ever, also calledtoRas BehariLalv. Regem (1933, 102L.].......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT