R v Waterfield

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1963
Year1963
Date1963
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
372 cases
  • Steel v Goacher
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Corey Dixon v Crown Prosecution Service
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 20 November 2018
    ...that breach of the peace in circumstances which reasonably appear to him to be proper.” 14 In another leading case, R v Waterfield [1964] 1 QB 164 at 170, the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) said: “In the judgment of this court it would be difficult … to reduce within specific limits th......
  • Oxford v Austin
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • Donnelly v Jackman
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ...assault upon this officer whilst acting in the execution of his duty, and I would dismiss this appeal. ASHWORTH J. I agree. LORD PARKER[1963] 3 W.L.R. 946; [1963] 3 All E.R. 659, C.C.A. and Rice v. Connolly [1966] 2 Q.B. 414; [1966] 3 W.L.R. 17; [1966] 2 All E.R. 649, D.C. Davis v. Lisle [1......
  • Get Started for Free
4 firm's commentaries
  • Court Of Appeal Summaries (April 27 ' May 1)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 12 May 2020
    ...Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 8 & 24(2), R. v. Lising, 2005 SCC 66, R. v. Grant, [1993] 3 S.C.R. 223, R. v. Waterfield [1963] 3 All E.R. 659, R. v. Chehil, 2013 SCC 49, R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50, R. v. Wong, 2017 BCSC 306, R. v. A.M., 2008 SCC 19, R. v. Tessling, 2004 SCC ......
  • Ontario Court Of Appeal Summaries (August 14-18)
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 24 August 2017
    ...Exclusion of Evidence at Trial, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, ss. 8 and 24(2), R v. Grant, 2009 SCC 32, R v. Waterfield, [1964] 1 Q.B. 164, R v. Mann, 2004 SCC 52, R v. Peterkin, 2015 ONCA 8 R v. McLean, 2017 ONCA 657 [Doherty, LaForme and Rouleau JJ.A.] Counsel: M Halfyard, for ......
  • The Supreme Court Of Canada Holds That The Common Law Does Not Empower The Police To Arrest A Person Who Is Acting Lawfully
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 18 October 2019
    ...conduct is authorized by a common law ancillary power was originally articulated by the English Court of Appeal in R v Waterfield, [1963] 3 All ER 659 (CA). The test had previously been adopted in Canada in Dedman v The Queen, [1985] 2 SCR 2, R v Mann, 2004 SCC 52, and R v MacDonald, 2014 S......
  • COVID-19: Can They Do That? Part IX: Enforcement Of Emergency Measures
    • Canada
    • Mondaq Canada
    • 22 April 2020
    ...the fulfilment" of one of their statutory or common law duties (R. v. Fleming, 2019 SCC 45, at para. 47; see also R. v. Waterfield, [1963] 3 All E.R. 659). This principle is known as the "ancillary powers For a police action to constitute a lawful exercise of an ancillary power, the police ......
19 books & journal articles
  • Subject Index, Volume 76, 2003
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 76-4, September 2003
    • 1 September 2003
    ...(2002) The Times, 3 April 167R v Stewart, unreported, 7 May 2003 250R v W (2003) EWCA Crim 1286, CA 332–336R v Waterf‌ield, R v Lynn [1963] 3 All ER 659 65R v Wickens 42 Cr App R 236 267, 268R (Rottman) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis and Another(2001) EWHC Admin 576; (2001) The ......
  • Table of cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Criminal Procedure. Fourth Edition
    • 23 June 2020
    ...R v Warring, 2017 ABCA 128, [2017] 7 WWR 441, 52 Alta LR (6th) 80 ...........441 R v Waterfield, [1963] 3 All ER 659 (CA)...................... 9, 17–20, 22, 120, 137, 184, 197, 207, 248–49, 253–54, 256, 262–63 Table of Cases 659 R v Way, 2019 ABQB 271 ............................................
  • Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • 27 February 2024
    ...]. 43 See R v Stillman , [1997] 1 SCR 607 [ Stillman ]; see also Sopinka J’s discussion in Kokesch , above note 26. 44 R v Waterield , [1963] 3 All ER 659 (CA) [ Waterield ]. 45 Fleming v Ontario , 2019 SCC 45 at para 43 [ Fleming ]. Nature of the Interaction Between Police and Individuals ......
  • Powers of Detention
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Detention and Arrest - Third Edition
    • 27 February 2024
    ..., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835, at pp. 875–78. The common law regarding police powers of detention, developed building on R. v. Waterield , [1963] 3 All E.R. 659 (C.A.), and Dedman v. The Queen , [1985] 2 S.C.R. 2, is consistent with Charter values because it requires the state to justify the interf......
  • Get Started for Free