R v Welstead
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1996 |
| Year | 1996 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
13 cases
-
Stephen Stubbs v R
...Crim LR 416 considered R v O'Laughlin and McLaughlin (1987) 85 Cr App R 157 distinguished R v Popescu [2010] EWCA Crim 1230 considered R v Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59 considered Reid v R (1978) 27 WIR 254 applied Shivnarine v The State (2012) 80 WIR 357 mentioned Director of Public Pr......
-
Gately v The Queen
...per Howie and Johnson JJ (Wood CJ at CL and Hunt AJA agreeing). 6 R v Rawlings [1995] 1 WLR 178 ; [1995] 1 All ER 580 and Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59. 7 R v O [1996] 3 NZLR 295 8 R v F (CC) [1997] 3 SCR 1183 . 9 See R v NZ (2005) 63 NSWLR 628 at 631 [4]. 10 Wilson and Powell, A Guide to......
-
R v Popescu (Nicolae Lucian)
...if it can, in what circumstances and when and why the jury can keep such a transcript after the evidence has been given. 23 However, in R v Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59, this court dealt with the question of whether it was right for a judge to permit a jury to have a transcript of an ABE ......
-
Karl Pagan Raine v The Crown
...quality is very poor. The reason for this approach is the danger that the Jury may give the written word undue weight, see Welstead [1996] 1 Cr App R 59 page 68, Morris [1998] Crim LR 416, referred to in Popescu at [30]. Otherwise the Prosecution may obtain a procedural and evidential advan......
Request a trial to view additional results