R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
| Judgment Date | 14 November 1995 |
| Date | 14 November 1995 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
258 cases
-
The Queen (on the application of Luke Davey) v Oxfordshire County Council The Equality and Human Rights Commission (Intervener)
...personal budget should not be admitted, where they contradict the contemporaneous record, relying upon the decision in R v Westminster City Council ex parte Ermakov [1996] 2 All E R 302 at 315h-j. The Defendant submits that the rule in Ermakov only applies to challenges based on breach of t......
-
R Gleeson Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and Another Wiltshire Council (Interested Party)
...That was the reason given in the letter. Thus it was substantially correct. This is nothing like the situation in R v Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov [1996] 2 All ER 302, where the reasons given were not the real reasons. Any inconsistency in the way this criterion is expressed i......
-
R Hewitson v Guildford Borough Council
...at the meeting rather than his ex-post facto rationalisation. Reliance was placed on the decision of the Court of Appeal in R v Westminster City Council ex parte Ermakov [1996] 28 HLR 819, and in particular the following passages that appear on page 833: "(2)The court can and, in appropriat......
-
Rika Shasha, Toni Shasha and Rownamoor Trustees Ltd as Trustees of the Placement Pension Fund v Westminster City Council Portman Mansions Residents Company Ltd (Interested Party)
...the statement should be treated as inadmissible on the basis of the principles enunciated by Hutchison LJ in R v Westminster City Council ex p Ermakov (1995) 28 HLR 819 at pp833–834. Ms Mackenzie was not merely elucidating the reasons in her 39 Mr Lewis submitted that Ms Mackenzie's evidenc......
Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
-
What Makes an Administrative Decision Unreasonable?
...irrational if instead had been based on certain other considerations, including cost.34 RvWestminsterCity Council, ex p Ermakov [1996] 2 All ER 302,315. As the text suggests,‘reasons’here means ‘re corded reasons’.35 ibid, 315.36 R(Nash)vChelsea College of Art and Design [2001] EWHC 538 (Ad......
-
THE CULTURE OF JUSTIFICATION IN ADMINISTRATIVE LAW: RATIONALES AND CONSEQUENCES.
...See Craig, Administrative Law, supra note 11 at 375. (105) See c.g.Rv Westminster City Council, ex parte Ermakov, [1995] EWCA Civ 42, [1996] 2 All ER 302 at 315; (Lanner Parish Council) v Cornwall Council, [2013] EWCA Civ 1290 at paras (106) See generally Matthew Groves, Janina Boughey &......