R v Williams (Hywell Rhys)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
Year1953
Date1953

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • R v Feely
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...depriving the other of it; ..." the factor of fraud that distinguishes a taking without consent from stealing (post, p. 541E). Reg. v. Williams [1953] 1 Q.B. 660, C.C.A. andReg. v. Cockburn [1968] 1 W.L.R. 281, C.A. doubted. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Cozens v. Bru......
  • Halstead v Patel
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
    ... ... 330; [1971] 2 W.L.R. 1308; [1971] All E.R. 870; 55 Cr.App.R. 184, C.A ... Reg. v. Williams [1953] 1 Q.B. 660; [1953] 2 W.L.R. 937; [1953] 1 All E.R. 1068, C.C.A ... No additional cases were ... ...
  • Scott v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 November 1974
  • Ivey v Genting Casinos (UK) Ltd (trading as Crockfords)
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 25 October 2017
    ...replaced, for the judge did define whether a state of mind, once ascertained as a matter of fact, was or was not fraudulent: R v Williams [1953] 1 QB 660. Accordingly, dishonesty cannot be regarded as a concept which would bring to the assessment of behaviour a clarity or certainty which wo......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Mistaking theft: Dishonesty ‘turns over a new leaf’
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-1, February 2022
    • 1 February 2022
    ...the question of felony open.28. E East, Pleas of the Crown, vol 2 (Straham, London 1803) 659.29. Ibid., 661.30. (1869) 11 Cox CC 549.31. [1953] 1 QB 660, 666.7Wang broader concept of dishonesty was adopted in the Theft Act 1968 to make that clear.32Turner was of theview that the word ‘fraud......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 47-2, April 1974
    • 1 April 1974
    ...again bothin theftandfraud cases. The point had been settled prior to theTheft Act by a far from satisfactory precedent, R. v. Williams[1953] 1 Q.B. 660. The point was bound to recur. In R. v. Feely[1971] 2 W.L.R. 201 a manager had "borrowed" the shop's moneywith the stated intention of pay......