R v Williams (Hywell Rhys)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1953
Year1953
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeal
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
37 cases
  • R v Feely
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
    • Invalid date
    ...depriving the other of it; ..." the factor of fraud that distinguishes a taking without consent from stealing (post, p. 541E). Reg. v. Williams [1953] 1 Q.B. 660, C.C.A. andReg. v. Cockburn [1968] 1 W.L.R. 281, C.A. doubted. The following cases are referred to in the judgment: Cozens v. Bru......
  • Halstead v Patel
    • United Kingdom
    • Divisional Court
    • Invalid date
  • R. v. Neve (L.C.),
    • Canada
    • Court of Appeal (Alberta)
    • 29 June 1999
    ...N.R. 349; 99 B.C.A.C. 81; 162 W.A.C. 81, refd to. [para. 27]. R. v. Lafrance, [1975] 2 S.C.R. 201, refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Williams, [1953] 1 Q.B. 660 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 28]. R. v. Kerr, [1965] 4 C.C.C. 37 (Man. C.A.), refd to. [para. 31]. R. v. Smith (E.) (1989), 74 Nfld. & P.E......
  • Scott v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 20 November 1974
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Mistaking theft: Dishonesty ‘turns over a new leaf’
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Journal of Criminal Law, The No. 86-1, February 2022
    • 1 February 2022
    ...the question of felony open.28. E East, Pleas of the Crown, vol 2 (Straham, London 1803) 659.29. Ibid., 661.30. (1869) 11 Cox CC 549.31. [1953] 1 QB 660, 666.7Wang broader concept of dishonesty was adopted in the Theft Act 1968 to make that clear.32Turner was of theview that the word ‘fraud......
  • Recent Judicial Decisions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Police Journal: Theory, Practice and Principles No. 47-2, April 1974
    • 1 April 1974
    ...again bothin theftandfraud cases. The point had been settled prior to theTheft Act by a far from satisfactory precedent, R. v. Williams[1953] 1 Q.B. 660. The point was bound to recur. In R. v. Feely[1971] 2 W.L.R. 201 a manager had "borrowed" the shop's moneywith the stated intention of pay......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT