R v Z
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judge | LADY JUSTICE HALLETT |
| Judgment Date | 11 November 2009 |
| Neutral Citation | [2009] EWCA Crim 2476 |
| Docket Number | No: 200904156 B5 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) |
| Date | 11 November 2009 |
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
-
R v AJ
...v Gul [2014] AC 1260. Para 26.” 43 At [13] Lord Thomas CJ continued: “We entirely agree with the reasoning, quoted above, in both R v F and R v Sarwar and are fortified in that conclusion by submissions made on behalf of the Secretary of State. It must be clearly understood, in relation to ......
-
R v R, M & L
...a number of cases this court has criticised the practice of declaring a Preparatory Hearing in order to give a right of appeal. An example is R v Z [2009] EWCA Crim 2476. This was a case where the ruling sought related to factually simple charges. This court declined jurisdiction, saying th......
-
R v O
...and make it clear for what purposes they wish to adduce the previous convictions and how they propose to do so. 13 So much is clear from R v Hanson [2005] 2 Cr App R Case No 21 at paragraph 17 and in the passage to which we have already referred in R v Humphris [2005] EWCA Crim 2030. Furthe......
-
R v C
...interlocutory appeals in the decision of this court in I, P, O, I &G. That guidance was repeated and re-emphasised by Hallett LJ in Z [2009] EWCA Crim 2476. At paragraph 22 Hughes LJ said: “Given the co-extensive powers of case management outside the preparatory hearing regime, courts ought......
Request a trial to view additional results